Usage Score
13.2
Player Dossier
2011-2015Cincinnati
Chris Moore
WR • 6'2" • Tampa, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chris Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
94.2
Consistency
63.5
Season Value
67.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
111212131314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Moore, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati. Chris Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 870 primary output with 94.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
79.1
Efficiency
94.2
Usage
13.2
Consistency
63.5
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 47. Unknown: 41. Temple: 48. Miami (OH): 73. Memphis: 153. UConn: 31. UCF: 108. Houston: 140. Tulsa: 77. South Florida: 131. East Carolina: 21
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Temple: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 5 by 97.3. Memphis: 5 by 100. UConn: 3 by 68.9. UCF: 3 by 100. Houston: 6 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 100. South Florida: 6 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 70
Split Comparison
Wins62 · n=5 · -41.8 vs Losses
Losses103.8 · n=5 · +41.8 vs Wins
First Half65.5 · n=6 · -29.9 vs Second Half
Second Half95.4 · n=5 · +29.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs San Diego State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/25 | vs San Diego State | L 7-42 | — | 1 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ East Carolina | W 19-16 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ South Florida100 receiving yards | L 27-65 | — | 6 | 131 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 1 | 54 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Tulsa | W 49-38 | — | 4 | 77 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Houston100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 30-33 | — | 6 | 140 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 2 | 35 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs UCF100 receiving yards | W 52-7 | — | 3 | 108 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs UConn | W 37-13 | — | 3 | 31 | 8.8 | 10.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 9/24 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards | L 46-53 | — | 5 | 153 | 26.5 | 30.60 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-33 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 35 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Temple | L 26-34 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122012201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Cincinnati | 113 | 88.3 | 6.8 | 113 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 113 | 88.3 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Cincinnati | 645 | 82.9 | 14.5 | 532 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 645 | 82.9 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Cincinnati | 673 | 85.9 | 13.3 | 28 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 673 | 85.9 | 13.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Cincinnati | 870 | 94.2 | 13.2 | 197 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 870 | 94.2 | 13.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
92
Primary metric
92 receiving yards with a 87.6 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
221
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
221 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Memphis
153
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
140
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
870 primary output · 94.2 efficiency · 13.2 usage
67.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Cincinnati
67.7
870 primary · 94.2 efficiency · 13.2 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
61.7
645 primary · 82.9 efficiency · 14.5 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8596
Gaither · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,301
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.