Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 1,573 primary output with 66.5 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Postseason | Mississippi State | 12 | 88 | 91 | -3 | 0 | 41.7 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 12 | 255 | 244 | 11 | 1 | 41.7 |
| 2013 Postseason | Mississippi State | 13 | 48 | 45 | 3 | 0 | 46.3 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 13 | 526 | 414 | 112 | 3 | 46.3 |
| 2014 Postseason | Mississippi State | 13 | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 79.6 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 13 | 1,498 | 1,128 | 370 | 12 | 79.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 1,573 primary output with 66.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 66.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
121
Efficiency
66.5
Usage
26.6
Consistency
75.7
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 75. Southern Miss: 136. UAB: 130. South Alabama: 116. LSU: 201. Texas A&M: 120. Auburn: 134. Kentucky: 209. Arkansas: 174. UT Martin: 42. Alabama: 106. Vanderbilt: 77. Ole Miss: 53
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 13 by 60.1. Southern Miss: 17 by 72.2. UAB: 21 by 64.5. South Alabama: 13 by 77.3. LSU: 17 by 99.3. Texas A&M: 20 by 64.3. Auburn: 21 by 58.5. Kentucky: 24 by 86.3. Arkansas: 25 by 50.1. UT Martin: 7 by 59.4. Alabama: 18 by 43.8. Vanderbilt: 8 by 90.1. Ole Miss: 14 by 38.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.