Usage Score
9.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025UTSA
TE • 6'5" • 235 lbs • Kingwood, TX, USA
Patrick Overmyer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.4
Efficiency
59.2
Consistency
21.6
Season Value
47.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Overmyer, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA. Patrick Overmyer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Patrick Overmyer played TE for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Patrick Overmyer recorded 40 rushing yards, 627 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
UTSA paired 283 primary output with 59.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 59.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
26.5
Efficiency
59.2
Usage
9.4
Consistency
21.6
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 50. Texas A&M: 7. Texas State: -2. Unknown: 6. Colorado State: 6. Temple: 7. Rice: 0. North Texas: 6. Tulane: 68. South Florida: 45. Charlotte: 20. East Carolina: 58. Army: 73
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 2 by 100. Texas A&M: 3 by 15.6. Texas State: 1 by 0. Unknown: 2 by 20. Colorado State: 1 by 40. Temple: 1 by 46.7. North Texas: 1 by 40. Tulane: 4 by 100. South Florida: 1 by 100. Charlotte: 2 by 66.7. East Carolina: 3 by 100. Army: 6 by 81.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Florida International | W 57-20 | — | 2 | 50 | 17.3 | 25 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army2+ TD | L 24-27 | — | 6 | 73 | 9.3 | 12.20 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs East Carolina | W 58-24 | — | 3 | 58 | 12 | 19.30 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | — | 1 | 45 | 16 | 45 | 1 | 45 |
| Thu 10/30 | vs Tulane | W 48-26 | — | 4 | 68 | 14 | 17 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas | L 17-55 | — | 1 | 6 | 3.5 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice | W 61-13 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Temple | L 21-27 | — | 1 | 7 | 2.7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| Sun 9/21 | @ Colorado State | W 17-16 | — | 1 | 6 | 3.3 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 6 | 2.3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas State | L 36-43 | — | 1 | -2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-42 | — | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 2.30 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 283 | 59.1 | 12.3 | 283 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 283 | 59.1 | 12.3 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | UTSA | 344 | 59.2 | 9.4 | 61 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 344 | 59.2 | 9.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68
Primary metric
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Army
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 81.1 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
East Carolina
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · UTSA
283 primary output · 59.1 efficiency · 12.3 usage
56.5
#2
2024 Regular Season · UTSA
56.5
283 primary · 59.1 efficiency · 12.3 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · UTSA
47.5
344 primary · 59.2 efficiency · 9.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8206
Kingwood Park · Humble, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
627
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.