Usage Score
14.3
Player Dossier
2011-2011Ole Miss
Tobias Singleton
WR • 6'2" • Madison, MS, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Tobias Singleton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
40
Consistency
3.7
Season Value
25.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Ole Miss
11
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tobias Singleton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Tobias Singleton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 12 primary output with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
1.3
Efficiency
40
Usage
14.3
Consistency
3.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 8/30 | @ Tulane | — | — | 3 | 74 | 24.7 | 24.70 | 0 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 12 | 40 | 14.3 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
74
Primary metric
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Mississippi State
16
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 35.6 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#4
Mississippi State
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Kentucky
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Ole Miss
12 primary output · 40 efficiency · 14.3 usage
25.2
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9283
Madison Central · Madison, MS
- Committed To
- Ole Miss
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
12
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.