Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2011-2014Auburn
TE • 6'5" • Suwanee, GA, USA
C.J. Uzomah reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10
Efficiency
82.4
Consistency
69.8
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Auburn
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
C.J. Uzomah, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Auburn. C.J. Uzomah reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Auburn paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
20.7
Efficiency
82.4
Usage
10
Consistency
69.8
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 20. Arkansas: 26. Louisiana Tech: 15. LSU: 10. Mississippi State: 23. Texas A&M: 12. Georgia: 39
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 1 by 100. Arkansas: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100. LSU: 2 by 33.3. Mississippi State: 2 by 76.7. Texas A&M: 1 by 80. Georgia: 3 by 86.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Auburn
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Auburn | 136 | 75.9 | 17.1 | 136 |
| 2013 Postseason | Auburn | 154 | 83.3 | 17 | 18 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Auburn | 154 | 83.3 | 17 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Auburn | 145 | 82.4 | 10 | -9 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Auburn | 145 | 82.4 | 10 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90
Primary metric
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Mississippi State
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Tennessee
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Auburn
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2013 Postseason · Auburn
67.5
154 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 17 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Auburn
67.5
154 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 17 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.902
North Gwinnett · Suwanee, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
435
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
C.J. Uzomah quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit