Usage Score
36.7
Player Dossier
2011-2013Auburn
Tre Mason
RB • 5'10" • Palm Beach, FL, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Tre Mason leans workhorse runner traits and 60.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
60.5
Consistency
69.5
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Auburn
1111121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tre Mason, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Auburn. Tre Mason leans workhorse runner traits and 60.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Auburn paired 1,979 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 60.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Auburn
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
141.4
Efficiency
60.5
Usage
36.7
Consistency
69.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 237. Washington State: 79. Arkansas State: 105. Mississippi State: 47. LSU: 145. Ole Miss: 139. Unknown: 107. Texas A&M: 178. Florida Atlantic: 60. Arkansas: 168. Tennessee: 117. Georgia: 121. Alabama: 164. Missouri: 312
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 35 by 64.1. Washington State: 16 by 51. Arkansas State: 15 by 73.4. Mississippi State: 11 by 39.1. LSU: 28 by 53.3. Ole Miss: 24 by 47. Unknown: 7 by 100. Texas A&M: 27 by 68.7. Florida Atlantic: 10 by 62.5. Arkansas: 32 by 54.7. Tennessee: 20 by 60.9. Georgia: 28 by 44.6. Alabama: 29 by 58.9. Missouri: 47 by 69
Split Comparison
Wins135.5 · n=11 · -55.5 vs Losses
Losses191 · n=2 · +55.5 vs Wins
First Half122.7 · n=7 · -37.3 vs Second Half
Second Half160 · n=7 · +37.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Missouri
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/7 | vs Florida State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 31-34 | 34 | 195 | 5.70 | 1 | 1 | 42 | 6.8 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Missouri100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 59-42 | 46 | 304 | 6.60 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 6.6 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Alabama100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 34-28 | 29 | 164 | 5.70 | 1 | — | — | 5.7 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Georgia100 rush yards | W 43-38 | 27 | 115 | 4.30 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4.3 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Tennessee100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 55-23 | 20 | 117 | 5.80 | 3 | — | — | 5.8 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Arkansas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 35-17 | 32 | 168 | 5.30 | 4 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 45-10 | 10 | 60 | 6 | 1 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Texas A&M100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 45-41 | 27 | 178 | 6.60 | 1 | — | — | 6.6 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Unknown100 rush yards · 2+ TD | — | 6 | 100 | 16.70 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 15.3 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Ole Miss | W 30-22 | 21 | 77 | 3.70 | 1 | 3 | 62 | 5.8 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ LSU100 rush yards · 2+ TD | L 21-35 | 26 | 132 | 5.10 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Mississippi State | W 24-20 | 10 | 34 | 3.40 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 4.3 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Arkansas State | W 38-9 | 14 | 99 | 7.10 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Washington State | W 31-24 | 15 | 73 | 4.90 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4.9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Auburn | 161 | 50.4 | 4.4 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Auburn | 161 | 50.4 | 4.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Auburn | 1,088 | 58.9 | 31.2 | 927 |
| 2013 Postseason | Auburn | 1,979 | 60.5 | 36.7 | 891 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Auburn | 1,979 | 60.5 | 36.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
312
Primary metric
312 scrimmage yards and 58 usage.
#2
Unknown
187
Primary metric
Game with 187 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
187 scrimmage yards and 23.2 usage.
#3
New Mexico State
152
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
152 scrimmage yards and 40.7 usage.
#4
Florida State
237
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
237 scrimmage yards and 52.2 usage.
#5
Virginia
64
Primary metric
Win with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
64 scrimmage yards and 16.7 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Auburn
1,979 primary output · 60.5 efficiency · 36.7 usage
66.7
#2
2013 Regular Season · Auburn
66.7
1,979 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 36.7 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Auburn
55.3
1,088 primary · 58.9 efficiency · 31.2 usage
Milestones
15
100+ rush yards
7
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8985
Park Vista Community · Lake Worth, FL
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,228
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.