Player Stats

Ty Benefield College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
230
TFL
18
Sacks
3
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2023 PostseasonBoise State12810--052.3
2023 Regular SeasonBoise State12353.5335052.3
2024 PostseasonBoise State149-0--055.3
2024 Regular SeasonBoise State14735013055.3
2025 PostseasonBoise State147-0-1067.8
2025 Regular SeasonBoise State14988.5012067.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Boise State paired 14.5 primary output with 41.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 41.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Air Force

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Boise State

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

1.0

Efficiency

41.6

Usage

10.5

Consistency

54.5

Best Game by takeover score

Air Force

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington: 1. South Florida: 0. Eastern Washington: 3. Air Force: 3. App State: 0. Notre Dame: 1.5. New Mexico: 1. UNLV: 2. Nevada: 1. Fresno State: 0. San Diego State: 0. Colorado State: 0. Utah State: 1. UNLV: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 7 by 39.2. South Florida: 6 by 25. Eastern Washington: 9 by 67.5. Air Force: 11 by 75.8. App State: 7 by 29.2. Notre Dame: 8 by 48.3. New Mexico: 1 by 14.2. UNLV: 7 by 49.2. Nevada: 6 by 35. Fresno State: 11 by 45.8. San Diego State: 11 by 45.8. Colorado State: 6 by 25. Utah State: 7 by 39.2. UNLV: 8 by 43.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 9 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs Wins