Usage / Role
29%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2013Pittsburgh
RB • 5'10" • Takoma Park, MD, USA
Malcolm Crockett leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Usage / Role
29%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
29
Developing production for a back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
30
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Malcolm Crockett, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Malcolm Crockett leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 2 | 42 | 18 | 24 | 0 | 70 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 2 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 70 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Malcolm Crockett played RB for Pittsburgh. Across 3 tracked seasons, Malcolm Crockett recorded 50 rushing yards and 24 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 74 primary output with 47.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 47.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Loss with 42 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Scrimmage Yards / G
37
Efficiency
47.6
Usage
12.9
Consistency
95.5
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 42. Gardner-Webb: 32
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
47.6 vs Gardner-Webb
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 74 | 47.6 | 12.9 | 74 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 74 | 47.6 | 12.9 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | -74 |
#1 Featured game
@ Ole Miss
Week 1 · L 17-38 · Postseason
Loss with 42 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
42
Scrimmage Yards
62 takeover
42 scrimmage yards and 13.5 usage.
#2
vs Gardner-Webb
Week 4 · W 55-10
32
Scrimmage Yards
53 takeover
Win with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32 scrimmage yards and 12.3 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh
74 primary output · 47.6 efficiency · 12.9 usage
70
#2
2012 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
70
74 primary · 47.6 efficiency · 12.9 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.