Player Stats

Blaire Sullivan College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
985
Passing yards
573
Rushing yards
412
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonUTEP00000-
2012 Regular SeasonUTEP5630390240469.9
2013 Regular SeasonUTEP5355183172149.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

UTEP paired 630 primary output with 57 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 45.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida International

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 60th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · UTEP

Games

5

Primary Metric / G

71

Efficiency

45.3

Usage

16.1

Consistency

60.3

Best Game by takeover score

Florida International

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Rice: 133. Texas A&M: 111. Florida International: 104. Tulane: -5. Middle Tennessee: 12

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 15 by 64.3. Texas A&M: 28 by 38.4. Florida International: 8 by 100. Tulane: 5 by 0. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 24

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins104 · Games = 1 · +41.3 vs Losses
Losses62.8 · Games = 4 · -41.3 vs Wins