Usage Score
33.4
Player Dossier
2011-2013Ball State
Willie Snead
WR • 5'11" • Belle Glade, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Willie Snead reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
89.7
Consistency
80.4
Season Value
75.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Ball State
1112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ball State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Willie Snead, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Ball State. Willie Snead reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Ball State paired 1,516 primary output with 89.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 89.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Ball State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
116.6
Efficiency
89.7
Usage
33.4
Consistency
80.4
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 87. Unknown: 164. Army: 64. North Texas: 77. Eastern Michigan: 175. Toledo: 131. Virginia: 104. Kent State: 152. Western Michigan: 90. Akron: 100. Central Michigan: 118. Northern Illinois: 121. Miami (OH): 133
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 9 by 64.4. Unknown: 9 by 100. Army: 5 by 85.3. North Texas: 5 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 100. Toledo: 7 by 100. Virginia: 6 by 100. Kent State: 10 by 100. Western Michigan: 7 by 85.7. Akron: 7 by 95.2. Central Michigan: 9 by 87.4. Northern Illinois: 12 by 67.2. Miami (OH): 11 by 80.6
Split Comparison
Wins118.6 · n=9 · +23.6 vs Losses
Losses95 · n=3 · -23.6 vs Wins
First Half114.6 · n=7 · -4.4 vs Second Half
Second Half119 · n=6 · +4.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/6 | vs Arkansas StateHigh volume | L 20-23 | — | 9 | 87 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 25 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 55-14 | — | 11 | 133 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 1 | 30 |
| Thu 11/14 | @ Northern Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-48 | — | 12 | 121 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 21 |
| Thu 11/7 | vs Central Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 44-24 | — | 9 | 118 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 2 | 45 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Akron100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 42-24 | — | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 2 | 37 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Western Michigan | W 38-17 | — | 7 | 90 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Kent State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-24 | — | 10 | 152 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 2 | 45 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Virginia100 receiving yards | W 48-27 | — | 6 | 104 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards | W 31-24 | — | 7 | 131 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-20 | — | 9 | 175 | 19.4 | 19.40 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ North Texas2+ TD | L 27-34 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Army | W 40-14 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 9 | 164 | 18.2 | 18.20 | 2 | 50 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ball State
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Ball State | 327 | 56.9 | 13.5 | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Ball State | 1,148 | 81.3 | 29.9 | 821 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ball State | 1,148 | 81.3 | 29.9 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Ball State | 1,516 | 89.7 | 33.4 | 368 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ball State | 1,516 | 89.7 | 33.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
175
Primary metric
175 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
216
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
216 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
180
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
164
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
152
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Ball State
1,516 primary output · 89.7 efficiency · 33.4 usage
75.9
#2
2013 Regular Season · Ball State
75.9
1,516 primary · 89.7 efficiency · 33.4 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Ball State
63.9
1,148 primary · 81.3 efficiency · 29.9 usage
Milestones
13
100+ receiving yards
11
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
Muskegon Heights · Muskegon, MI
- Committed To
- Ball State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,991
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.