Player Stats

M.J. McFarland College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
178
Receptions
19
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonTexas0-00-
2012 Regular SeasonTexas58125173.9
2013 Regular SeasonTexas1-00100
2014 Regular SeasonTexas81153242.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Texas paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 34.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Texas

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

6.6

Efficiency

34.2

Usage

7.7

Consistency

66.9

Best Game by takeover score

Texas Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 7. UCLA: 2. Kansas: 1. Baylor: 6. Iowa State: 11. Texas Tech: 13. West Virginia: 9. Oklahoma State: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 2 by 23.3. UCLA: 1 by 13.3. Kansas: 1 by 6.7. Baylor: 2 by 20. Iowa State: 2 by 36.7. Texas Tech: 1 by 86.7. West Virginia: 1 by 60. Oklahoma State: 1 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins7.5 · Games = 6 · +3.5 vs Losses
Losses4 · Games = 2 · -3.5 vs Wins