Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2023-2025Tulane
Arnold Barnes
RB • 5'10" • 216 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Arnold Barnes leans balanced backfield option traits and 40.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
40.5
Consistency
38.9
Season Value
35.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Tulane
23242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Arnold Barnes, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Tulane. Arnold Barnes leans balanced backfield option traits and 40.5 efficiency.
Arnold Barnes played RB for Tulane. Across 3 tracked seasons, Arnold Barnes recorded 757 rushing yards, 35 receiving yards, and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Tulane.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Tulane paired 421 primary output with 40.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 40.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with 52 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
21.2
Efficiency
40.5
Usage
8.7
Consistency
38.9
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 28. South Alabama: 12. Duke: 39. Ole Miss: 47. Tulsa: 52. East Carolina: 31. Memphis: -4. Florida Atlantic: 6. Temple: 9. Charlotte: 7. North Texas: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 5 by 58.3. South Alabama: 5 by 25. Duke: 6 by 60.8. Ole Miss: 11 by 44.5. Tulsa: 9 by 61.6. East Carolina: 7 by 46.1. Memphis: 1 by 0. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 62.5. Temple: 3 by 31.3. Charlotte: 3 by 24.3. North Texas: 2 by 31.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins18.6 · Games = 10
First Half34.8 · Games = 6 · +30.0 vs Second Half
Second Half4.8 · Games = 5 · -30.0 vs First Half
All Games21.2 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
62.5 vs Florida Atlantic
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/6 | vs North Texas | W 34-21 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Charlotte | W 27-0 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Temple | W 37-13 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 35-24 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Memphis | W 38-32 | 1 | -4 | -4 | 0 | — | — | -4 |
| Thu 10/9 | vs East Carolina | W 26-19 | 7 | 31 | 4.40 | 0 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Tulsa | W 31-14 | 8 | 48 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5.8 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-45 | 11 | 47 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Duke | W 34-27 | 5 | 27 | 5.40 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 6.5 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ South Alabama | W 33-31 | 5 | 12 | 2.40 | 0 | — | — | 2.4 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Northwestern | W 23-3 | 5 | 28 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Tulane | 138 | 46.7 | 5.7 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Tulane | 421 | 40.7 | 12 | 283 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tulane | 421 | 40.7 | 12 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulane | 233 | 40.5 | 8.7 | -188 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 71 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
71
Primary metric
71 scrimmage yards and 8 usage.
#2
North Texas
83
Primary metric
Win with 83 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
83 scrimmage yards and 22.8 usage.
#3
UAB
82
Primary metric
Win with 82 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
82 scrimmage yards and 17.2 usage.
#4
Tulsa
52
Primary metric
Win with 52 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
52 scrimmage yards and 15 usage.
#5
Ole Miss
47
Primary metric
Loss with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
47 scrimmage yards and 22.4 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Tulane
421 primary output · 40.7 efficiency · 12 usage
48.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Tulane
48.1
421 primary · 40.7 efficiency · 12 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Tulane
35.7
233 primary · 40.5 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8647
KIPP Booker T. Washington · New Orleans, LA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
792
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.