Usage Score
6.8
Player Dossier
2023-2025Michigan
Kendrick Bell
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Kansas City, MO, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kendrick Bell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90
Consistency
64.9
Season Value
59.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Michigan
2324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendrick Bell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Michigan. Kendrick Bell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Michigan paired 54 primary output with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Michigan
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
18
Efficiency
90
Usage
6.8
Consistency
64.9
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 24. New Mexico: 30. Nebraska: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins15 · n=2
First Half27 · n=2
All Games18 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Michigan | 70 | 64.4 | 8 | 70 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Michigan | 70 | 64.4 | 8 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Michigan | 54 | 90 | 6.8 | -16 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Michigan | 54 | 90 | 6.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30
Primary metric
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Fresno State
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Michigan
54 primary output · 90 efficiency · 6.8 usage
59.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Michigan
59.2
54 primary · 90 efficiency · 6.8 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Michigan
57.8
70 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8689
Park Hill · Kansas City, MO
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
124
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 11 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.