Usage Score
21.4
Player Dossier
2024-2025Stanford
Cole Tabb
RB • 5'8" • 200 lbs • Fort Walton Beach, FL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Cole Tabb leans balanced backfield option traits and 42.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
42.5
Consistency
53.4
Season Value
54.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Stanford
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cole Tabb, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Stanford. Cole Tabb leans balanced backfield option traits and 42.5 efficiency.
Cole Tabb played RB for Stanford. Across 2 tracked seasons, Cole Tabb recorded 575 rushing yards, 31 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Stanford.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Stanford paired 467 primary output with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Stanford
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
42.5
Efficiency
42.5
Usage
21.4
Consistency
53.4
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 34. Boston College: 31. Virginia: 27. San José State: 48. SMU: 74. Florida State: 118. Miami: 64. Pittsburgh: 3. North Carolina: 32. California: 2. Notre Dame: 34
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 6 by 64.2. Boston College: 7 by 46.1. Virginia: 7 by 40.2. San José State: 12 by 41.7. SMU: 10 by 73.9. Florida State: 28 by 43.9. Miami: 19 by 35.1. Pittsburgh: 9 by 3.5. North Carolina: 4 by 83.3. California: 4 by 5.2. Notre Dame: 12 by 30
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins49.8 · Games = 4 · +11.5 vs Losses
Losses38.3 · Games = 7 · -11.5 vs Wins
First Half55.3 · Games = 6 · +28.3 vs Second Half
Second Half27 · Games = 5 · -28.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida State
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs North Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/30 | vs Notre Dame | L 20-49 | 11 | 32 | 2.90 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2.8 |
| Sun 11/23 | vs California | W 31-10 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | — | — | 0.5 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ North Carolina | L 15-20 | 4 | 32 | 8 | 1 | — | — | 8 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Pittsburgh | L 20-35 | 9 | 3 | 0.30 | 0 | — | — | 0.3 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Miami | L 7-42 | 19 | 64 | 3.40 | 0 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs Florida State100 rush yards | W 20-13 | 28 | 118 | 4.20 | 1 | — | — | 4.2 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ SMU | L 10-34 | 9 | 62 | 6.90 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 7.4 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs San José State | W 30-29 | 12 | 48 | 4 | 1 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Virginia | L 20-48 | 7 | 27 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Boston College | W 30-20 | 7 | 31 | 4.40 | 0 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sat 8/23 | @ Hawai'i | L 20-23 | 4 | 26 | 6.50 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Stanford | 139 | 49.7 | 17.8 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Stanford | 467 | 42.5 | 21.4 | 328 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
118
Primary metric
118 scrimmage yards and 51.9 usage.
#2
NC State
72
Primary metric
Loss with 72 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
72 scrimmage yards and 22.9 usage.
#3
SMU
74
Primary metric
Loss with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 18.2 usage.
#4
Miami
64
Primary metric
Loss with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
64 scrimmage yards and 48.7 usage.
#5
North Carolina
32
Primary metric
Loss with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32 scrimmage yards and 6.5 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Stanford
467 primary output · 42.5 efficiency · 21.4 usage
54.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Stanford
38.4
139 primary · 49.7 efficiency · 17.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8783
Choctawhatchee · Fort Walton Beach, FL
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
606
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 14 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.