Usage / Role
43%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2024-2025Stanford
RB • 5'8" • 200 lbs • Fort Walton Beach, FL, USA
Cole Tabb leans balanced backfield option traits and 42.5 efficiency.
Usage / Role
43%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
34
Developing production for a back
Reliability
33
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
51
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Stanford
Snapshot
Player Story
Cole Tabb built his college career from 2024 through 2025 as a running back from Fort Walton Beach, FL wearing No. 33, spending time with Stanford. The clearest part of Cole Tabb's career was his backfield work: 575...
Read the storyCole Tabb, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Stanford. Cole Tabb leans balanced backfield option traits and 42.5 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Stanford | 3 | 139 | 130 | 9 | 0 | 46.7 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Stanford | 11 | 467 | 445 | 22 | 3 | 64.3 |
Related Context
Transfer Portal History
| Season | Path | Movement | Value | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Stanford to Cincinnati | P4 to P4 | 77.5 | Jan 5, 2026 |
Cole Tabb played RB for Stanford. Across 2 tracked seasons, Cole Tabb recorded 575 rushing yards, 31 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Stanford paired 467 primary output with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
42.5
Efficiency
42.5
Usage
21.4
Consistency
53.4
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 34. Boston College: 31. Virginia: 27. San José State: 48. SMU: 74. Florida State: 118. Miami: 64. Pittsburgh: 3. North Carolina: 32. California: 2. Notre Dame: 34
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 6 by 64.2. Boston College: 7 by 46.1. Virginia: 7 by 40.2. San José State: 12 by 41.7. SMU: 10 by 73.9. Florida State: 28 by 43.9. Miami: 19 by 35.1. Pittsburgh: 9 by 3.5. North Carolina: 4 by 83.3. California: 4 by 5.2. Notre Dame: 12 by 30
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida State
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs North Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/30 | vs Notre Dame | L 20-49 | 11 | 32 | 2.90 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2.8 |
| Sun 11/23 | vs California | W 31-10 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | — | — | 0.5 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ North Carolina | L 15-20 | 4 | 32 | 8 | 1 | — | — | 8 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Pittsburgh | L 20-35 | 9 | 3 | 0.30 | 0 | — | — | 0.3 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Miami | L 7-42 | 19 | 64 | 3.40 | 0 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs Florida State100 rush yards | W 20-13 | 28 | 118 | 4.20 | 1 | — | — | 4.2 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ SMU | L 10-34 | 9 | 62 | 6.90 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 7.4 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs San José State | W 30-29 | 12 | 48 | 4 | 1 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Virginia | L 20-48 | 7 | 27 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Boston College | W 30-20 | 7 | 31 | 4.40 | 0 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sat 8/23 | @ Hawai'i | L 20-23 | 4 | 26 | 6.50 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5.7 |
Player Story
Cole Tabb built his college career from 2024 through 2025 as a running back from Fort Walton Beach, FL wearing No. 33, spending time with Stanford. The clearest part of Cole Tabb's career was his backfield work: 575 rushing yards, 141 carries, 3 rushing touchdowns, and 31 receiving yards across 14 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2025 with Stanford. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 31 receiving yards, 1 tackle, and 66 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 14 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Stanford.
The arc is straightforward: Cole Tabb moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Stanford | 139 | 49.7 | 17.8 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Stanford | 467 | 42.5 | 21.4 | 328 |
#1 Featured game
vs No. 41 Florida State
Week 8 · W 20-13 · Conference game
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
118
Scrimmage Yards
81.3 takeover
118 scrimmage yards and 51.9 usage.
#2
@ NC State
Week 10 · L 28-59 · Conference game
72
Scrimmage Yards
77.9 takeover
Loss with 72 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
72 scrimmage yards and 22.9 usage.
#3
@ No. 9 Miami
Week 9 · L 7-42 · Conference game · Ranked opponent
64
Scrimmage Yards
63.1 takeover
Loss with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
64 scrimmage yards and 48.7 usage.
#4
@ No. 23 SMU
Week 7 · L 10-34 · Conference game · Ranked opponent
74
Scrimmage Yards
62.9 takeover
Loss with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 18.2 usage.
#5
vs No. 118 San José State
Week 5 · W 30-29
48
Scrimmage Yards
48.2 takeover
Win with 48 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
48 scrimmage yards and 21.8 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Stanford
467 primary output · 42.5 efficiency · 21.4 usage
64.3
#2
2024 Regular Season · Stanford
46.7
139 primary · 49.7 efficiency · 17.8 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.