Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2025-2025Gardner-Webb
Caleb Borders
WR • 5'10" • 180 lbs • Shelby, NC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Caleb Borders reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
96.7
Consistency
62
Season Value
86.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Gardner-Webb
25
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Gardner-Webb
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Caleb Borders, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Gardner-Webb. Caleb Borders reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Caleb Borders is listed as a WR for Gardner-Webb. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Gardner-Webb paired 78 primary output with 96.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 96.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Gardner-Webb
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
39
Efficiency
96.7
Usage
—
Consistency
62
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 14. Ohio: 64
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
All Games39 · Games = 2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Gardner-Webb
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Gardner-Webb | 78 | 96.7 | — | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
30
Primary metric
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
64
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
James Madison
29
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia Tech
14
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Coastal Carolina
0
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Gardner-Webb
78 primary output · 96.7 efficiency · — usage
86.2
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 6 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.