Player Stats

Andrew Armstrong College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,904
Receptions
134
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonArkansas1256764577.4
2024 Regular SeasonArkansas11781,140189.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Arkansas paired 1,140 primary output with 88.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 88.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Arkansas

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

103.6

Efficiency

88.6

Usage

38.1

Consistency

70.4

Best Game by takeover score

Oklahoma State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 164. UAB: 137. Auburn: 47. Texas A&M: 72. Tennessee: 132. LSU: 94. Mississippi State: 76. Ole Miss: 135. Texas: 74. Louisiana Tech: 81. Missouri: 128

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 10 by 100. UAB: 8 by 100. Auburn: 5 by 62.7. Texas A&M: 6 by 80. Tennessee: 9 by 97.8. LSU: 7 by 89.5. Mississippi State: 4 by 100. Ole Miss: 6 by 100. Texas: 6 by 82.2. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 67.5. Missouri: 9 by 94.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins94.6 · Games = 5 · -16.6 vs Losses
Losses111.2 · Games = 6 · +16.6 vs Wins