Usage Score
15.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025Georgia
Colbie Young
WR • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Binghamton, NY, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Colbie Young reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.5
Consistency
70.4
Season Value
58.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Miami
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Miami • Georgia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Colbie Young, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Miami. Colbie Young reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Colbie Young played WR for Miami and Georgia. Across 4 tracked seasons, Colbie Young recorded 1,446 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 13 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Miami.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Miami paired 563 primary output with 79.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami, Georgia.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Georgia
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
44.8
Efficiency
83.5
Usage
15.8
Consistency
70.4
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 22. Marshall: 30. Unknown: 76. Tennessee: 73. Alabama: 59. Kentucky: 9. Auburn: 53. Ole Miss: 36
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 3 by 48.9. Marshall: 2 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 72.4. Tennessee: 4 by 100. Alabama: 4 by 98.3. Kentucky: 1 by 60. Auburn: 4 by 88.3. Ole Miss: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins40.2 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses40.5 · Games = 2 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half50.3 · Games = 4 · +11 vs Second Half
Second Half39.3 · Games = 4 · -11 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | vs Ole Miss | L 34-39 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Ole Miss | W 43-35 | — | 1 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Auburn | W 20-10 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Kentucky | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Alabama | L 21-24 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Tennessee | W 44-41 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 76 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Marshall | W 45-7 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Georgia
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Miami | 376 | 57.9 | 22.4 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Miami | 563 | 79.4 | 18.2 | 187 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia | 149 | 71.3 | 9.9 | -414 |
| 2025 Postseason | Georgia | 358 | 83.5 | 15.8 | 209 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Georgia | 358 | 83.5 | 15.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127
Primary metric
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tennessee
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Alabama
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Miami
563 primary output · 79.4 efficiency · 18.2 usage
64.8
#2
2025 Postseason · Georgia
58.1
358 primary · 83.5 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Georgia
58.1
358 primary · 83.5 efficiency · 15.8 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9919
Ponte Vedra · Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
- Committed To
- Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,446
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 33 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.