Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2023-2025UT Martin
WR • 6'4" • 215 lbs • Lancaster, TX, USA
Phaizon Wilson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
65.7
Consistency
27.5
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UT Martin
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Phaizon Wilson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UT Martin. Phaizon Wilson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Phaizon Wilson is listed as a WR for Akron and UT Martin. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UT Martin paired 93 primary output with 65.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Akron, UT Martin.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
31
Efficiency
65.7
Usage
—
Consistency
27.5
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 4. UTEP: 74. Missouri State: 15
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 1 by 26.7. UTEP: 7 by 70.5. Missouri State: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs Missouri State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Akron
2023-2024
Opening stop
UT Martin
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UT Martin | 93 | 65.7 | — | 93 |
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
74
Primary metric
74 receiving yards with a 70.5 efficiency score.
#2
Missouri State
15
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oklahoma State
4
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · UT Martin
93 primary output · 65.7 efficiency · — usage
64.4
#2
2023 Regular Season · Akron
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Akron
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8911
Lancaster · Lancaster, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 3 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.