Usage Score
2.6
Player Dossier
2022-2025Texas Tech
Amier Boyd-Matthews
DB • 6'2" • 190 lbs • Phoenix, AZ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Amier Boyd-Matthews shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
15.3
Consistency
58
Season Value
44
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP • Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amier Boyd-Matthews, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech. Amier Boyd-Matthews shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.3 disruption score.
Amier Boyd-Matthews played DB for UTEP and Texas Tech. Across 4 tracked seasons, Amier Boyd-Matthews recorded 61 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas Tech.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 9 primary output with 15.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 15.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UTEP, Texas Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
15.3
Usage
2.6
Consistency
58
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 2. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 1. Kent State: 0. Utah: 0. Houston: 0. Kansas: 1. Arizona State: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Kansas State: 1. BYU: 1. UCF: 0. West Virginia: 1. BYU: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 7 by 49.2. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 3 by 22.5. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Utah: 1 by 4.2. Houston: 1 by 4.2. Kansas: 2 by 18.3. Arizona State: 4 by 26.7. Oklahoma State: 1 by 4.2. Kansas State: 2 by 18.3. BYU: 1 by 14.2. UCF: 1 by 4.2. West Virginia: 1 by 14.2. BYU: 1 by 14.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 11 · -1.0 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 2 · +1.0 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oregon
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs Oregon
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | vs OregonSplash game | L 0-23 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | vs BYU | W 34-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ West Virginia | W 49-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs UCF | W 48-9 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs BYU | W 29-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Kansas State | W 43-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oklahoma State | W 42-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arizona State | L 22-26 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Kansas | W 42-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Houston | W 35-11 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Utah | W 34-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kent State | W 62-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff | W 67-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Texas Tech
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 16.7 | 3 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTEP | 4 | 12.3 | 2 | 4 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTEP | 6 | 18.1 | 3.3 | 2 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas Tech | 9 | 15.3 | 2.6 | 3 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 9 | 15.3 | 2.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.6 takeover score.
#2
Kennesaw State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.1 takeover score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.4 takeover score.
#4
Arizona State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.5 takeover score.
#5
Arkansas-Pine Bluff
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
9 primary output · 15.3 efficiency · 2.6 usage
44
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech
44
9 primary · 15.3 efficiency · 2.6 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
39.9
0 primary · 16.7 efficiency · 3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.7944
Mountain Pointe · Phoenix, AZ
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
61
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Amier Boyd-Matthews
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.