Usage Score
11.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025Oregon
LB • 6'2" • 232 lbs • Eugene, OR, USA
Bryce Boettcher shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
11.4
Efficiency
44.7
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
20.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Oregon
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bryce Boettcher, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Oregon. Bryce Boettcher shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.7 disruption score.
Bryce Boettcher played LB for Oregon. Across 4 tracked seasons, Bryce Boettcher recorded 1 rushing yards, 258 tackles, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Oregon.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Oregon paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 44.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
44.7
Usage
11.4
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 2. Texas Tech: 0. James Madison: 1.5. Unknown: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. Northwestern: 2.5. Oregon State: 0. Penn State: 0.5. Indiana: 0. Rutgers: 0. Wisconsin: 3. Iowa: 2. Minnesota: 0. USC: 1. Washington: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 11 by 65.8. Texas Tech: 12 by 50. James Madison: 9 by 52.5. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Oklahoma State: 9 by 37.5. Northwestern: 5 by 45.8. Oregon State: 10 by 41.7. Penn State: 12 by 55. Indiana: 11 by 45.8. Rutgers: 7 by 29.2. Wisconsin: 6 by 55. Iowa: 8 by 53.3. Minnesota: 6 by 25. USC: 13 by 60. Washington: 10 by 41.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/10 | @ Indiana10+ tackles | L 22-56 | 11 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 1/1 | @ Texas Tech10+ tackles | W 23-0 | 12 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/21 | vs James Madison | W 51-34 | 9 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Washington10+ tackles | W 26-14 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs USC10+ tackles | W 42-27 | 13 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Minnesota | W 42-13 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Iowa | W 18-16 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Wisconsin | W 21-7 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Rutgers | W 56-10 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Indiana10+ tackles | L 20-30 | 11 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Penn State10+ tackles | W 30-24 | 12 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Oregon State10+ tackles | W 41-7 | 10 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Northwestern | W 34-14 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Oklahoma State | W 69-3 | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oregon
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Oregon | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Oregon | 3.5 | 17.2 | 4.3 | 3.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oregon | 3.5 | 17.2 | 4.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Oregon | 14 | 38.7 | 9.1 | 10.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oregon | 14 | 38.7 | 9.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oregon | 12.5 | 44.7 | 11.4 | -1.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oregon | 12.5 | 44.7 | 11.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Washington
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63 takeover score.
#2
Wisconsin
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
#3
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
#4
Texas Tech
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.7 takeover score.
#5
Northwestern
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Oregon
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35
#2
2024 Postseason · Oregon
29.3
14 primary · 38.7 efficiency · 9.1 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Oregon
29.3
14 primary · 38.7 efficiency · 9.1 usage
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
9
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
258
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.