Usage Score
7.5
Player Dossier
2024-2025Sam Houston
WR • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Wichita, KS, USA
Lonnie Adkism reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.5
Efficiency
40
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
37.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Sam Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lonnie Adkism, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Sam Houston. Lonnie Adkism reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lonnie Adkism played WR for Sam Houston. Across 2 tracked seasons, Lonnie Adkism recorded -3 rushing yards, 28 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Sam Houston.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Sam Houston paired 24 primary output with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
8
Efficiency
40
Usage
7.5
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 24. Louisiana Tech: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
80 vs UTEP
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Sam Houston
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Postseason | Sam Houston | 4 | 26.7 | 4.3 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Sam Houston | 4 | 26.7 | 4.3 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Sam Houston | 24 | 40 | 7.5 | 20 |
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24
Primary metric
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia Southern
4
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a 0 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Sam Houston
24 primary output · 40 efficiency · 7.5 usage
37.7
#2
2024 Postseason · Sam Houston
24.1
4 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 4.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Sam Houston
24.1
4 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 4.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8581
Miller · Corpus Christi, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
28
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.