Usage Score
25.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025Western Michigan
RB • 5'11" • 210 lbs • Aurora, IL, USA
Jalen Buckley leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.8 efficiency.
Usage Score
25.8
Efficiency
48.8
Consistency
54.1
Season Value
55.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2023 Regular Season · Western Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jalen Buckley, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2023 Regular Season · Western Michigan. Jalen Buckley leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.8 efficiency.
Jalen Buckley played RB for Western Michigan. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jalen Buckley recorded 2,710 rushing yards, 348 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Western Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Western Michigan paired 1,158 primary output with 53.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with 195 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
82.9
Efficiency
48.8
Usage
25.8
Consistency
54.1
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kennesaw State: 174. Michigan State: 28. North Texas: 163. Illinois: 13. Toledo: 14. Massachusetts: 66. Ball State: 20. Miami (OH): 45. Central Michigan: 68. Ohio: 81. Northern Illinois: 133. Eastern Michigan: 78. Miami (OH): 195
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kennesaw State: 8 by 100. Michigan State: 13 by 23.6. North Texas: 32 by 44.6. Illinois: 6 by 22.6. Toledo: 12 by 16.8. Massachusetts: 13 by 52.4. Ball State: 7 by 23.4. Miami (OH): 10 by 46.9. Central Michigan: 14 by 50.6. Ohio: 15 by 59.1. Northern Illinois: 24 by 57.7. Eastern Michigan: 17 by 46.5. Miami (OH): 20 by 90.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kennesaw State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/19 | vs Kennesaw State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 41-6 | 8 | 174 | 21.80 | 1 | — | — | 21.8 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs Miami (OH)100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 23-13 | 19 | 193 | 10.20 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9.8 |
| Wed 11/26 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 31-21 | 16 | 70 | 4.40 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4.6 |
| Wed 11/19 | @ Northern Illinois100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 35-19 | 24 | 133 | 5.50 | 2 | — | — | 5.5 |
| Wed 11/12 | vs Ohio | W 17-13 | 14 | 82 | 5.90 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 5.4 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Central Michigan | W 24-21 | 14 | 68 | 4.90 | 1 | — | — | 4.9 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Miami (OH) | L 17-26 | 10 | 45 | 4.50 | 0 | — | — | 4.5 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Ball State | W 42-0 | 6 | 11 | 1.80 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 2.9 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Massachusetts | W 21-3 | 12 | 60 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5.1 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Toledo | W 14-13 | 11 | 21 | 1.90 | 0 | 1 | -7 | 1.2 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Illinois | L 0-38 | 6 | 13 | 2.20 | 0 | — | — | 2.2 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs North Texas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 30-33 | 30 | 112 | 3.70 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 5.1 |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Michigan State | L 6-23 | 9 | 21 | 2.30 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 2.2 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Western Michigan
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 27 | 29.9 | 5.8 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 1,158 | 53.7 | 30.5 | 1,131 |
| 2024 Postseason | Western Michigan | 795 | 55.2 | 27.1 | -363 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 795 | 55.2 | 27.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Western Michigan | 1,078 | 48.8 | 25.8 | 283 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 1,078 | 48.8 | 25.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with 195 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
195
Primary metric
195 scrimmage yards and 31.3 usage.
#2
Akron
117
Primary metric
Win with 117 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
117 scrimmage yards and 14.8 usage.
#3
Toledo
190
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
190 scrimmage yards and 42.6 usage.
#4
Kennesaw State
174
Primary metric
Win with 174 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
174 scrimmage yards and 14.5 usage.
#5
St. Francis (PA)
198
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
198 scrimmage yards and 36.5 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2023 Regular Season · Western Michigan
1,158 primary output · 53.7 efficiency · 30.5 usage
63.3
#2
2024 Postseason · Western Michigan
56.6
795 primary · 55.2 efficiency · 27.1 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Western Michigan
56.6
795 primary · 55.2 efficiency · 27.1 usage
10
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,058
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.