Player Stats

Kevin Jennings College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
8,205
Passing yards
7,653
Rushing yards
552
Touchdowns
65

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonSMU42132058136.2
2023 PostseasonSMU724219151137.4
2023 Regular SeasonSMU751242785537.4
2024 PostseasonSMU14170195-25170.2
2024 Regular SeasonSMU143,3732,9943792770.2
2025 PostseasonSMU132822784072.5
2025 Regular SeasonSMU133,4133,363503072.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

SMU paired 3,695 primary output with 59.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 59.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami

Win with 357 yards of offense and 58.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · SMU

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

284.2

Efficiency

59.5

Usage

17.3

Consistency

92.1

Best Game by takeover score

Miami

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 282. East Texas A&M: 272. Baylor: 311. Missouri State: 270. TCU: 303. Syracuse: 279. Stanford: 228. Clemson: 310. Wake Forest: 178. Miami: 357. Boston College: 327. Louisville: 305. California: 273

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 33 by 60.1. East Texas A&M: 36 by 63.1. Baylor: 36 by 66.5. Missouri State: 40 by 55.2. TCU: 43 by 57.9. Syracuse: 39 by 59.8. Stanford: 34 by 60.5. Clemson: 49 by 58.4. Wake Forest: 42 by 50.9. Miami: 52 by 58.8. Boston College: 35 by 56.4. Louisville: 43 by 62.5. California: 42 by 62.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins292.2 · Games = 9 · +26.0 vs Losses
Losses266.3 · Games = 4 · -26.0 vs Wins