Usage Score
17.3
Player Profile
Kevin Jennings
QB • 6'0" • 192 lbs • Oak Cliff, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Kevin Jennings is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
59.5
Consistency
92.1
Season Value
67.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU
22232324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- SMU
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Kevin Jennings, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU. Kevin Jennings is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
SMU paired 3,695 primary output with 59.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 59.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Win with 357 yards of offense and 58.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · SMU
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
284.2
Efficiency
59.5
Usage
17.3
Consistency
92.1
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 282. Unknown: 272. Baylor: 311. Missouri State: 270. TCU: 303. Syracuse: 279. Stanford: 228. Clemson: 310. Wake Forest: 178. Miami: 357. Boston College: 327. Louisville: 305. California: 273
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 33 by 60.1. Unknown: 36 by 63.1. Baylor: 36 by 66.5. Missouri State: 40 by 55.2. TCU: 43 by 57.9. Syracuse: 39 by 59.8. Stanford: 34 by 60.5. Clemson: 49 by 58.4. Wake Forest: 42 by 50.9. Miami: 52 by 58.8. Boston College: 35 by 56.4. Louisville: 43 by 62.5. California: 42 by 62.9
Split Comparison
Wins294.8 · n=8 · +28.5 vs Losses
Losses266.3 · n=4 · -28.5 vs Wins
First Half277.9 · n=7 · -13.8 vs Second Half
Second Half291.7 · n=6 · +13.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Miami
Best efficiency game
66.5 vs Baylor
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Arizona | W 24-19 | 21 | 32 | 278 | 65.6 | 0 | 3 | 60.1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/30 | @ California3+ TD | L 35-38 | 24 | 36 | 250 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 62.9 | 6 | 23 | 3.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Louisville300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 38-6 | 29 | 37 | 303 | 78.4 | 3 | 0 | 62.5 | 6 | 2 | 0.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Boston College300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 45-13 | 16 | 32 | 326 | 50.0 | 3 | 1 | 56.4 | 3 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Miami300-yard game | W 26-20 | 29 | 44 | 365 | 65.9 | 1 | 0 | 58.8 | 8 | -8 | -1 | 1 | 5 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Wake Forest | L 12-13 | 21 | 39 | 171 | 53.8 | 0 | 1 | 50.9 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Clemson | W 35-24 | 23 | 43 | 290 | 53.5 | 2 | 1 | 58.4 | 6 | 20 | 3.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Stanford | W 34-10 | 22 | 30 | 247 | 73.3 | 2 | 0 | 60.5 | 4 | -19 | -4.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Syracuse3+ TD | W 31-18 | 29 | 35 | 285 | 82.9 | 4 | 1 | 59.8 | 4 | -6 | -1.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ TCU3+ TD | L 24-35 | 24 | 38 | 290 | 63.2 | 3 | 2 | 57.9 | 5 | 13 | 2.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Missouri State | W 28-10 | 24 | 36 | 281 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 55.2 | 4 | -11 | -2.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Baylor3+ TD | L 45-48 | 16 | 22 | 295 | 72.7 | 3 | 1 | 66.5 | 14 | 16 | 1.10 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 22 | 30 | 260 | 73.3 | 2 | 1 | 63.1 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | SMU | 213 | 70 | 3.9 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | SMU | 754 | 66.2 | 13.3 | 541 |
| 2023 Regular Season | SMU | 754 | 66.2 | 13.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | SMU | 3,543 | 65.9 | 18.9 | 2,789 |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 3,543 | 65.9 | 18.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | SMU | 3,695 | 59.5 | 17.3 | 152 |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 3,695 | 59.5 | 17.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
394
Primary metric
394 total offense with 91.1 efficiency.
#2
Tulane
31
Primary metric
Loss with 31 yards of offense and 95.4 efficiency.
31 total offense with 95.4 efficiency.
#3
Miami
357
Primary metric
Win with 357 yards of offense and 58.8 efficiency.
357 total offense with 58.8 efficiency.
#4
Tulane
266
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
266 total offense with 56.6 efficiency.
#5
Baylor
311
Primary metric
Loss with 311 yards of offense and 66.5 efficiency.
311 total offense with 66.5 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · SMU
3,695 primary output · 59.5 efficiency · 17.3 usage
67.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · SMU
67.2
3,695 primary · 59.5 efficiency · 17.3 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · SMU
65.5
3,543 primary · 65.9 efficiency · 18.9 usage
Milestones
21
250+ passing yards
10
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
21
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8378
South Oak Cliff · Dallas, TX
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
8,205
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.