Player Stats

Adonis Williams Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
175
TFL
11.5
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonOhio927311-026.1
2023 PostseasonOhio112-0--057.5
2023 Regular SeasonOhio11383.51.532057.5
2024 PostseasonOhio93-0--022.9
2024 Regular SeasonOhio93010-3022.9
2025 PostseasonOhio12511--049.6
2025 Regular SeasonOhio12703011049.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Ohio paired 11 primary output with 25.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 31.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UNLV

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Ohio

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

31.9

Usage

6.9

Consistency

45.2

Best Game by takeover score

UNLV

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 2. Rutgers: 0. West Virginia: 1. Ohio State: 0. Gardner-Webb: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Ball State: 1. Northern Illinois: 0. Eastern Michigan: 1. Western Michigan: 0. Massachusetts: 1. Buffalo: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 5 by 40.8. Rutgers: 11 by 45.8. West Virginia: 3 by 22.5. Ohio State: 9 by 37.5. Gardner-Webb: 5 by 20.8. Bowling Green: 7 by 29.2. Ball State: 11 by 55.8. Northern Illinois: 6 by 25. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 18.3. Western Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Massachusetts: 9 by 47.5. Buffalo: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 8 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 4 · -0.5 vs Wins