Usage Score
5.3
Player Dossier
2022-2023North Texas
S • 5'9" • 184 lbs • Sugar Land, TX, USA
Patrick Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.3
Efficiency
30.2
Consistency
3.3
Season Value
10
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Smith, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · North Texas. Patrick Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Patrick Smith played S for North Texas. Across 2 tracked seasons, Patrick Smith recorded 72 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with North Texas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
North Texas paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 30.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
30.2
Usage
5.3
Consistency
3.3
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Unknown: 0. Temple: 0. Tulane: 0. Memphis: 0. UTSA: 0. SMU: 0. Tulsa: 0. UAB: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 7 by 29.2. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 29.2. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Temple: 7 by 29.2. Tulane: 9 by 37.5. Memphis: 5 by 20.8. UTSA: 8 by 33.3. SMU: 8 by 33.3. Tulsa: 10 by 41.7. UAB: 6 by 35
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
41.7 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs UAB | W 45-42 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Tulsa10+ tackles | W 35-28 | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ SMU | L 21-45 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs UTSA | L 29-37 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Memphis | L 42-45 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Tulane | L 28-35 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Temple | W 45-14 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 40-37 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs California | L 21-58 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2022-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | North Texas | 1 | 30.2 | 5.3 | 1 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#2
Tulsa
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 16.4 takeover score.
#3
Tulane
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 15 takeover score.
#4
SMU
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 13.1 takeover score.
#5
UTSA
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 12.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · North Texas
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
35
#2
2023 Regular Season · North Texas
10
1 primary · 30.2 efficiency · 5.3 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8156
Clements · Sugar Land, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
72
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.