Usage Score
13.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025Army
Eric Ford
LB • 6'3" • 235 lbs • Laurel, MD, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Eric Ford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
37.4
Consistency
29.2
Season Value
45
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Army
222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric Ford, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Army. Eric Ford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.4 disruption score.
Eric Ford played LB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Eric Ford recorded 79 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Army.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Army paired 21.5 primary output with 37.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Army
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
2.0
Efficiency
37.4
Usage
13.3
Consistency
29.2
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: 3. Tarleton State: 4. North Texas: 0. East Carolina: 1.5. Charlotte: 3. Tulane: 0. Air Force: 1. Temple: 1. Tulsa: 0. UTSA: 7. Navy: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 2 by 38.3. Tarleton State: 8 by 73.3. North Texas: 7 by 29.2. East Carolina: 3 by 27.5. Charlotte: 4 by 46.7. Tulane: 2 by 8.3. Air Force: 7 by 39.2. Temple: 2 by 18.3. Tulsa: 5 by 20.8. UTSA: 6 by 75. Navy: 6 by 35
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins3 · Games = 5 · +1.9 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 6 · -1.9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
75 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs UConnSplash game | W 41-16 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/13 | @ Navy | L 16-17 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ UTSA2+ sacks · Splash game | W 27-24 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Tulsa | L 25-26 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Temple | W 14-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Air Force | W 20-17 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Tulane | L 17-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs CharlotteSplash game | W 24-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/25 | @ East Carolina | L 6-28 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs North Texas | L 38-45 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Tarleton StateSplash game | L 27-30 | 8 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Army | 0.5 | 6.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
| 2024 Postseason | Army | 6 | 13.4 | 4.2 | 5.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Army | 6 | 13.4 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Army | 21.5 | 37.4 | 13.3 | 15.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Army | 21.5 | 37.4 | 13.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 71.6 takeover score.
#2
Tarleton State
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#3
UAB
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.7 takeover score.
#4
Temple
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.7 takeover score.
#5
Charlotte
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Army
21.5 primary output · 37.4 efficiency · 13.3 usage
45
#2
2025 Regular Season · Army
45
21.5 primary · 37.4 efficiency · 13.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Army
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
6
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8056
Landon School · Bethesda, MD
- Committed To
- Army
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
79
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Eric Ford
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.