Player Stats

Kenyatta Jackson Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
53
TFL
17
Sacks
9.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonOhio State2210--021.2
2023 PostseasonOhio State51-0--026
2023 Regular SeasonOhio State5621.5--026
2024 PostseasonOhio State10510-1031.6
2024 Regular SeasonOhio State101121.5--031.6
2025 PostseasonOhio State131-0--061.6
2025 Regular SeasonOhio State1327116.522061.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Ohio State paired 21.5 primary output with 25.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 25.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Penn State

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Ohio State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.7

Efficiency

25.1

Usage

10.1

Consistency

36.9

Best Game by takeover score

Penn State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0. Texas: 0. Ohio: 1. Washington: 3. Minnesota: 1. Illinois: 3. Wisconsin: 2. Penn State: 5.5. Purdue: 0. UCLA: 1. Rutgers: 0. Michigan: 3. Indiana: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 3 by 12.5. Ohio: 2 by 18.3. Washington: 1 by 34.2. Minnesota: 0 by 10. Illinois: 2 by 38.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 24.2. Penn State: 4 by 66.7. Purdue: 2 by 8.3. UCLA: 4 by 26.7. Rutgers: 2 by 8.3. Michigan: 3 by 42.5. Indiana: 3 by 32.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.8 · Games = 11 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 2 · -0.8 vs Wins