Usage Score
49.5
Player Dossier
2022-2025Navy
WR • 6'0" • 206 lbs • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Eli Heidenreich reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
49.5
Efficiency
86.4
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Navy
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eli Heidenreich, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Navy. Eli Heidenreich reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Eli Heidenreich played WR for Navy. Across 4 tracked seasons, Eli Heidenreich recorded 1,157 rushing yards, 1,994 receiving yards, and 11 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Navy.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Navy paired 941 primary output with 86.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
72.4
Efficiency
86.4
Usage
49.5
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 64. Unknown: 65. UAB: 21. Tulsa: 40. Rice: 44. Air Force: 243. Temple: 72. Florida Atlantic: 22. North Texas: 68. Notre Dame: 20. South Florida: 146. Memphis: 64. Army: 72
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 5 by 85.3. Unknown: 6 by 72.2. UAB: 2 by 70. Tulsa: 2 by 100. Rice: 2 by 100. Air Force: 8 by 100. Temple: 3 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 73.3. North Texas: 6 by 75.6. Notre Dame: 2 by 66.7. South Florida: 5 by 100. Memphis: 2 by 100. Army: 6 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | @ Cincinnati | W 35-13 | — | 5 | 64 | 8.4 | 12.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 12/13 | vs Army | W 17-16 | — | 6 | 72 | 9.1 | 12 | 1 | 21 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Memphis | W 28-17 | — | 2 | 64 | 9.6 | 32 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards | W 41-38 | — | 5 | 146 | 16.8 | 29.20 | 0 | 82 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Notre Dame | L 10-49 | — | 2 | 20 | 11.7 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ North Texas | L 17-31 | — | 6 | 68 | 8.9 | 11.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 42-32 | — | 2 | 22 | 5.1 | 11 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Temple | W 32-31 | — | 3 | 72 | 13.3 | 24 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-31 | — | 8 | 243 | 30.4 | 30.40 | 3 | 80 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Rice | W 21-13 | — | 2 | 44 | 8.4 | 22 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Tulsa | W 42-23 | — | 2 | 40 | 11.2 | 20 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs UAB | W 38-24 | — | 2 | 21 | 9.8 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 65 | 9 | 10.80 | 1 | 35 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Navy
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Navy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Navy | 382 | 78.1 | 23.2 | 382 |
| 2024 Postseason | Navy | 671 | 79.1 | 40.6 | 289 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Navy | 671 | 79.1 | 40.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Navy | 941 | 86.4 | 49.5 | 270 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Navy | 941 | 86.4 | 49.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98
Primary metric
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Air Force
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Air Force
243
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
243 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Navy
941 primary output · 86.4 efficiency · 49.5 usage
65.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Navy
65.8
941 primary · 86.4 efficiency · 49.5 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Navy
58
671 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 40.6 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,994
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.