Player Stats

Caleb Nix College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
64
TFL
4
Passes defended
3
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonClemson00-0--0-
2023 Regular SeasonClemson11-0--036.4
2024 Regular SeasonClemson00-0--0-
2025 PostseasonJacksonville State147-0--061.5
2025 Regular SeasonJacksonville State145640-3361.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Jacksonville State paired 11 primary output with 26.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 26.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Clemson, Jacksonville State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kennesaw State

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Jacksonville State

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

26.6

Usage

7.8

Consistency

53.9

Best Game by takeover score

Kennesaw State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Troy: 0. UCF: 0. Liberty: 1. Georgia Southern: 1. Murray State: 1. Southern Miss: 1.5. Sam Houston: 0. Delaware: 0. Middle Tennessee: 2. UTEP: 1.5. Kennesaw State: 2. Florida International: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Kennesaw State: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 7 by 29.2. UCF: 4 by 16.7. Liberty: 4 by 26.7. Georgia Southern: 2 by 18.3. Murray State: 5 by 30.8. Southern Miss: 8 by 48.3. Sam Houston: 5 by 20.8. Delaware: 0 by 0. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 36.7. UTEP: 5 by 35.8. Kennesaw State: 11 by 65.8. Florida International: 3 by 12.5. Western Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. Kennesaw State: 3 by 22.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 9 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Wins