Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Louisville
LB • 6'3" • 230 lbs • Georgetown, KY, USA
Kalib Perry shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.2
Efficiency
20.3
Consistency
7.7
Season Value
9.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kalib Perry, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Tennessee. Kalib Perry shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.3 disruption score.
Kalib Perry played LB for Tennessee and Louisville. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kalib Perry recorded 116 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Louisville.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Tennessee paired 0 primary output with 8.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Louisville.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
20.3
Usage
5.2
Consistency
7.7
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 0. Unknown: 0. James Madison: 0. Bowling Green: 0.5. Pittsburgh: 0. Virginia: 0. Miami: 1. Boston College: 2. Virginia Tech: 0. California: 0. Clemson: 0. SMU: 0. Kentucky: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. James Madison: 6 by 25. Bowling Green: 3 by 17.5. Pittsburgh: 5 by 20.8. Virginia: 2 by 8.3. Miami: 2 by 18.3. Boston College: 11 by 65.8. Virginia Tech: 6 by 25. California: 3 by 12.5. Clemson: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 5 by 20.8. Kentucky: 5 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/23 | vs Toledo | W 27-22 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Kentucky | W 41-0 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ SMU | L 6-38 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Clemson | L 19-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | vs California | L 26-29 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Virginia Tech | W 28-16 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Boston College10+ tackles · Splash game | W 38-24 | 11 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/17 | @ Miami | W 24-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Virginia | L 27-30 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Pittsburgh | W 34-27 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Bowling Green | W 40-17 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/5 | vs James Madison | W 28-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2022-2024
Opening stop
Louisville
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | 8.3 | 1.5 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Tennessee | 0 | 8.7 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | 8.7 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Tennessee | 2.5 | 13.4 | 2.9 | 2.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tennessee | 2.5 | 13.4 | 2.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Louisville | 3.5 | 20.3 | 5.2 | 1 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Louisville | 3.5 | 20.3 | 5.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 62 takeover score.
#2
UTEP
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 46.2 takeover score.
#3
Alabama
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 33.5 takeover score.
#4
Miami
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.4 takeover score.
#5
Bowling Green
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 19.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Tennessee
0 primary output · 8.7 efficiency · 1.5 usage
36.8
#2
2023 Regular Season · Tennessee
36.8
0 primary · 8.7 efficiency · 1.5 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Tennessee
36.6
0 primary · 8.3 efficiency · 1.5 usage
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.83
Notre Dame · Sherman Oaks, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
116
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.