Usage Score
16.1
Player Dossier
2022-2025Iowa
Kaden Wetjen
WR • 5'9" • 196 lbs • Williamsburg, IA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Kaden Wetjen reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
44
Consistency
24.3
Season Value
36.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Iowa
22232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Iowa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kaden Wetjen, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Iowa. Kaden Wetjen reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kaden Wetjen played WR for Iowa. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kaden Wetjen recorded 132 rushing yards, 197 receiving yards, and 15 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Iowa.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Iowa paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 44 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Iowa
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
11.6
Efficiency
44
Usage
16.1
Consistency
24.3
Best Game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 0. Unknown: 2. Iowa State: 4. Massachusetts: 0. Rutgers: 20. Indiana: 29. Wisconsin: 4. Penn State: 21. Minnesota: 49. Oregon: 3. USC: 19. Michigan State: 0. Nebraska: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 13.3. Iowa State: 1 by 26.7. Rutgers: 2 by 66.7. Indiana: 4 by 48.3. Wisconsin: 3 by 8.9. Penn State: 2 by 70. Minnesota: 3 by 100. Oregon: 1 by 20. USC: 3 by 42.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins11.8 · Games = 8 · -2 vs Losses
Losses13.8 · Games = 4 · +2 vs Wins
First Half8.4 · Games = 7 · -6.9 vs Second Half
Second Half15.3 · Games = 6 · +6.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
100 vs Minnesota
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | @ Vanderbilt | W 34-27 | — | — | — | 1.5 | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Nebraska | W 40-16 | — | — | — | 0.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Michigan State | W 20-17 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ USC | L 21-26 | — | 3 | 19 | 10 | 6.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Oregon | L 16-18 | — | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Minnesota | W 41-3 | — | 3 | 49 | 14.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Penn State | W 25-24 | — | 2 | 21 | 5.6 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Wisconsin | W 37-0 | — | 3 | 4 | 3.5 | 1.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Indiana | L 15-20 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Rutgers | W 38-28 | — | 2 | 20 | 5.3 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Massachusetts | W 47-7 | — | — | — | 20 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Iowa State | L 13-16 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Iowa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Iowa | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Iowa | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Iowa | 46 | 71.7 | 9.7 | 46 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Iowa | 46 | 71.7 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Iowa | 151 | 44 | 16.1 | 105 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Iowa | 151 | 44 | 16.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49
Primary metric
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Troy
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Penn State
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#4
Indiana
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 48.3 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Iowa
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0 usage
50
#2
2023 Regular Season · Iowa
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Iowa
36.9
151 primary · 44 efficiency · 16.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
197
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.