Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Temple
Javier Morton
S • 6'2" • 195 lbs • Atlanta, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Javier Morton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
23.5
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
12.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Nebraska
22232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Nebraska • Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Javier Morton, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Nebraska. Javier Morton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.5 disruption score.
Javier Morton played S for Nebraska and Temple. Across 4 tracked seasons, Javier Morton recorded 90 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Temple.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Nebraska paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 23.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Nebraska, Temple.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Temple
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
23.5
Usage
5.2
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Massachusetts: 0. Unknown: 1.5. Oklahoma: 0. Charlotte: 0. Tulsa: 2. East Carolina: 0. Army: 0. Tulane: 0. North Texas: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Massachusetts: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 5 by 35.8. Oklahoma: 3 by 12.5. Charlotte: 1 by 4.2. Tulsa: 4 by 36.7. East Carolina: 4 by 16.7. Army: 9 by 37.5. Tulane: 8 by 33.3. North Texas: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.7 · Games = 3 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · Games = 5 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · Games = 4 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
37.5 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | @ North Texas | L 25-52 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Tulane | L 13-37 | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Army | L 13-14 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs East Carolina | L 14-45 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Tulsa | W 38-37 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Charlotte | W 49-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Oklahoma | L 3-42 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Massachusetts | W 42-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Nebraska
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Temple
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Nebraska | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Nebraska | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Temple | 2 | 24.4 | 6.2 | 2 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Temple | 4.5 | 23.5 | 5.2 | 2.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.5 takeover score.
#2
East Carolina
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 47.3 takeover score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.3 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
1.5
Primary metric
Game with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 42 takeover score.
#5
North Texas
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 25 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Nebraska
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
34.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Temple
12.2
4.5 primary · 23.5 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Temple
10.5
2 primary · 24.4 efficiency · 6.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.817
Hamshire-Fannett · Hamshire, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
90
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.