Usage Score
10.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025BYU
LB • 6'5" • 240 lbs • South Jordan, UT, USA
Isaiah Glasker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.4
Efficiency
29.1
Consistency
32.8
Season Value
23.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · BYU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Glasker, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · BYU. Isaiah Glasker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.1 disruption score.
Isaiah Glasker played LB for BYU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Isaiah Glasker recorded 136 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with BYU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
BYU paired 25 primary output with 41.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
29.1
Usage
10.4
Consistency
32.8
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 0. Unknown: 1.5. Stanford: 2. East Carolina: 3. Colorado: 3. West Virginia: 1. Arizona: 1. Utah: 0. Iowa State: 0. Texas Tech: 3. TCU: 0. Cincinnati: 0. UCF: 0. Texas Tech: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 6 by 25. Unknown: 3 by 27.5. Stanford: 4 by 36.7. East Carolina: 6 by 55. Colorado: 4 by 46.7. West Virginia: 4 by 26.7. Arizona: 5 by 30.8. Utah: 5 by 20.8. Iowa State: 3 by 12.5. Texas Tech: 10 by 71.7. TCU: 6 by 25. UCF: 1 by 4.2. Texas Tech: 6 by 25
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
71.7 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Georgia Tech | W 25-21 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Texas Tech | L 7-34 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs UCF | W 41-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Cincinnati | W 26-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | vs TCU | W 44-13 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Texas Tech10+ tackles · Splash game | L 7-29 | 10 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Iowa State | W 41-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/19 | vs Utah | W 24-21 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Arizona | W 33-27 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs West Virginia | W 38-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/28 | @ ColoradoSplash game | W 24-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ East CarolinaSplash game | W 34-13 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Stanford | W 27-3 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
BYU
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | BYU | 25 | 41.7 | 19.6 | 25 |
| 2024 Regular Season | BYU | 25 | 41.7 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | BYU | 14.5 | 29.1 | 10.4 | -10.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | BYU | 14.5 | 29.1 | 10.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 69.4 takeover score.
#2
Texas Tech
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 64.5 takeover score.
#3
Colorado
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.4 takeover score.
#4
East Carolina
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.3 takeover score.
#5
Arizona State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · BYU
25 primary output · 41.7 efficiency · 19.6 usage
40.9
#2
2024 Regular Season · BYU
40.9
25 primary · 41.7 efficiency · 19.6 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · BYU
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
2
Impact games
7
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8333
Bingham · South Jordan, UT
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
136
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.