Player Stats

Aneyas Williams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
655
Rushing yards
443
Receiving yards
212
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2024 PostseasonNotre Dame131314586056.1
2024 Regular SeasonNotre Dame1326017486256.1
2025 Regular SeasonNotre Dame626422440553.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Notre Dame paired 391 primary output with 62.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 82.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Stanford

Win with 123 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

44

Efficiency

82.1

Usage

8.1

Consistency

40.3

Best Game by takeover score

Stanford

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 0. Purdue: 10. Arkansas: 20. Navy: 72. Syracuse: 39. Stanford: 123

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 4 by 26. Arkansas: 2 by 91.7. Navy: 5 by 100. Syracuse: 3 by 100. Stanford: 12 by 92.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins52.8 · Games = 5 · +52.8 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -52.8 vs Wins