Usage Score
7.8
Player Dossier
2024-2025Nebraska
Williams Nwaneri
DL • 6'7" • 265 lbs • Lee's Summit, MO, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Williams Nwaneri shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
19.8
Consistency
36.3
Season Value
23.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Nebraska
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Missouri • Nebraska
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Williams Nwaneri, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Nebraska. Williams Nwaneri shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.8 disruption score.
Williams Nwaneri played DL for Missouri and Nebraska. Across 2 tracked seasons, Williams Nwaneri recorded 29 tackles and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Nebraska.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Nebraska paired 8.5 primary output with 19.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 19.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Missouri, Nebraska.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Nebraska
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
19.8
Usage
7.8
Consistency
36.3
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 1.5. Akron: 0. Unknown: 0. Michigan: 0. Michigan State: 3. Minnesota: 1. Northwestern: 0. USC: 1. UCLA: 2. Penn State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 6 by 40. Akron: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 0 by 0. Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Michigan State: 5 by 50.8. Minnesota: 4 by 26.7. Northwestern: 2 by 8.3. USC: 3 by 22.5. UCLA: 2 by 28.3. Penn State: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.3 · Games = 5 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 4 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/23 | @ Penn State | L 10-37 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | @ UCLA | W 28-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs USC | L 17-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Northwestern | W 28-21 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Minnesota | L 6-24 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Michigan State | W 38-27 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Michigan | L 27-30 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Akron | W 68-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Cincinnati | W 20-17 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Missouri
2024
Opening stop
- 2
Nebraska
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Missouri | 2 | 14.2 | 6.3 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Nebraska | 8.5 | 19.8 | 7.8 | 6.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#2
Massachusetts
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.9 takeover score.
#3
Cincinnati
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 36.1 takeover score.
#4
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 35.9 takeover score.
#5
Minnesota
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 25.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Nebraska
8.5 primary output · 19.8 efficiency · 7.8 usage
23.3
#2
2024 Regular Season · Missouri
19.3
2 primary · 14.2 efficiency · 6.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.996
Lee's Summit North · Lee's Summit, MO
- Committed To
- Missouri
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
2
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
29
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 12 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.