Usage Score
14.4
Player Dossier
2024-2025Texas
Emmett Mosley V
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Chicago, IL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Emmett Mosley V reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.7
Consistency
71
Season Value
60.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Stanford
242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Stanford • Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Emmett Mosley V, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Stanford. Emmett Mosley V reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Emmett Mosley V played WR for Stanford and Texas. Across 2 tracked seasons, Emmett Mosley V recorded 6 rushing yards, 933 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Stanford.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Stanford paired 525 primary output with 71.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Stanford, Texas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
45.3
Efficiency
81.7
Usage
14.4
Consistency
71
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 51. Florida: 40. Oklahoma: 8. Kentucky: 31. Mississippi State: 53. Vanderbilt: 69. Georgia: 66. Arkansas: 81. Texas A&M: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 5 by 68. Florida: 2 by 100. Oklahoma: 1 by 53.3. Kentucky: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 4 by 88.3. Vanderbilt: 7 by 65.7. Georgia: 3 by 100. Arkansas: 4 by 100. Texas A&M: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins43.1 · Games = 7 · -9.9 vs Losses
Losses53 · Games = 2 · +9.9 vs Wins
First Half36.6 · Games = 5 · -19.6 vs Second Half
Second Half56.3 · Games = 4 · +19.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Michigan | W 41-27 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Texas A&M | W 27-17 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Arkansas | W 52-37 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Georgia | L 10-35 | — | 3 | 66 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Vanderbilt | W 34-31 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Mississippi State2+ TD | W 45-38 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 2 | 21 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Kentucky | W 16-13 | — | 1 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Oklahoma | W 23-6 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Florida | L 21-29 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2024
Opening stop
- 2
Texas
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Stanford | 525 | 71.8 | 31.1 | — |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas | 408 | 81.7 | 14.4 | -117 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas | 408 | 81.7 | 14.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
168
Primary metric
168 receiving yards with a 86.2 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
San José State
101
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 96.2 efficiency score.
#5
Vanderbilt
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 65.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Stanford
525 primary output · 71.8 efficiency · 31.1 usage
61.9
#2
2025 Postseason · Texas
60.7
408 primary · 81.7 efficiency · 14.4 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Texas
60.7
408 primary · 81.7 efficiency · 14.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8883
Santa Margarita Catholic · Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
933
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 18 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.