Player Stats

Jake Merklinger College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
259
Passing yards
221
Rushing yards
38
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2024 Regular SeasonTennessee2704822052.6
2025 Regular SeasonTennessee318917316256.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Tennessee paired 189 primary output with 59.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 59.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: East Tennessee State

Win with 135 yards of offense and 79.9 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Tennessee

Games

3

Primary Metric / G

63

Efficiency

59.7

Usage

4.6

Consistency

55.5

Best Game by takeover score

East Tennessee State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. East Tennessee State: 135. UAB: 56. New Mexico State: -2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Tennessee State: 16 by 79.9. UAB: 10 by 49.2. New Mexico State: 2 by 50

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half95.5 · Games = 2 · +97.5 vs Second Half
Second Half-2 · Games = 1 · -97.5 vs First Half