Usage Score
24.5
Player Dossier
2024-2025Auburn
Cam Coleman
WR • 6'3" • 201 lbs • Phenix City, AL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Cam Coleman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.1
Consistency
60.1
Season Value
65.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Auburn
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cam Coleman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Auburn. Cam Coleman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Cam Coleman played WR for Auburn. Across 2 tracked seasons, Cam Coleman recorded 1,323 receiving yards and 13 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Auburn.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Auburn paired 725 primary output with 77.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Auburn
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
60.4
Efficiency
77.1
Usage
24.5
Consistency
60.1
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 23. Ball State: 77. South Alabama: 49. Oklahoma: 88. Texas A&M: 18. Georgia: 50. Missouri: 108. Arkansas: 27. Kentucky: 34. Vanderbilt: 143. Unknown: 65. Alabama: 43
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 1 by 100. Ball State: 7 by 73.3. South Alabama: 2 by 100. Oklahoma: 3 by 100. Texas A&M: 4 by 30. Georgia: 7 by 47.6. Missouri: 6 by 100. Arkansas: 2 by 90. Kentucky: 5 by 45.3. Vanderbilt: 10 by 95.3. Unknown: 5 by 86.7. Alabama: 5 by 57.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins44 · Games = 4 · -25.1 vs Losses
Losses69.1 · Games = 7 · +25.1 vs Wins
First Half50.8 · Games = 6 · -19.2 vs Second Half
Second Half70 · Games = 6 · +19.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Missouri
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/30 | vs Alabama | L 20-27 | — | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volume | L 38-45 | — | 10 | 143 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Kentucky | L 3-10 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Arkansas | W 33-24 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Missouri100 receiving yards | L 17-23 | — | 6 | 108 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Georgia | L 10-20 | — | 7 | 50 | 7.1 | 7.10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-16 | — | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Oklahoma | L 17-24 | — | 3 | 88 | 29.3 | 29.30 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs South Alabama | W 31-15 | — | 2 | 49 | 24.5 | 24.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Ball State | W 42-3 | — | 7 | 77 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Baylor | W 38-24 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Auburn | 598 | 80.8 | 18 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Auburn | 725 | 77.1 | 24.5 | 127 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128
Primary metric
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Vanderbilt
143
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 95.3 efficiency score.
#3
Missouri
108
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UL Monroe
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Auburn
725 primary output · 77.1 efficiency · 24.5 usage
65.2
#2
2024 Regular Season · Auburn
61.4
598 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 18 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.9985
Central · Phenix City, AL
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
1,323
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 22 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.