Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 2,774 primary output with 65.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
C.J. Carr College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 2,774
- Passing yards
- 2,741
- Rushing yards
- 33
- Touchdowns
- 27
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2025 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 12 | 2,774 | 2,741 | 33 | 27 | 67.9 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 65.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Win with 218 yards of offense and 93.8 efficiency. It landed in the 33.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
231.2
Efficiency
65.3
Usage
11.3
Consistency
81.1
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 237. Texas A&M: 278. Purdue: 223. Arkansas: 354. Boise State: 214. NC State: 332. USC: 129. Boston College: 311. Navy: 218. Pittsburgh: 219. Syracuse: 39. Stanford: 220
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 41 by 56.5. Texas A&M: 35 by 56.6. Purdue: 14 by 70.8. Arkansas: 32 by 67.9. Boise State: 26 by 79.3. NC State: 34 by 60.1. USC: 31 by 47.4. Boston College: 27 by 82.9. Navy: 16 by 93.8. Pittsburgh: 37 by 52.5. Syracuse: 10 by 50.2. Stanford: 31 by 65.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins225.9 · Games = 10 · -31.6 vs Losses
Losses257.5 · Games = 2 · +31.6 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring C.J. Carr
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.