Usage Score
9.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025Georgia
London Humphreys
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Nashville, TN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
London Humphreys reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.9
Consistency
63.6
Season Value
52.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Vanderbilt • Georgia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
London Humphreys, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Vanderbilt. London Humphreys reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
London Humphreys played WR for Vanderbilt and Georgia. Across 3 tracked seasons, London Humphreys recorded 12 rushing yards, 959 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Vanderbilt.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Vanderbilt paired 439 primary output with 89.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Vanderbilt, Georgia.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Georgia
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
27.6
Efficiency
76.9
Usage
9.4
Consistency
63.6
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 8. Unknown: 29. Tennessee: 59. Alabama: 9. Kentucky: 35. Auburn: 25. Ole Miss: 20. Florida: 0. Mississippi State: 36. Texas: 55
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 3 by 17.8. Unknown: 3 by 64.4. Tennessee: 2 by 100. Alabama: 1 by 60. Kentucky: 2 by 100. Auburn: 2 by 83.3. Ole Miss: 2 by 66.7. Mississippi State: 1 by 100. Texas: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins29.8 · Games = 8
First Half28 · Games = 5 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half27.2 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs First Half
All Games27.6 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/16 | vs Texas | W 35-10 | — | 2 | 55 | 27.5 | 27.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Mississippi State | W 41-21 | — | 1 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Florida | W 24-20 | — | — | — | 7 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Ole Miss | W 43-35 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Auburn | W 20-10 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Kentucky | W 35-14 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Alabama | L 21-24 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Tennessee | W 44-41 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Marshall | W 45-7 | — | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 2.70 | 1 | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2023
Opening stop
- 2
Georgia
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 439 | 89.4 | 13.1 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia | 244 | 81 | 8.3 | -195 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Georgia | 276 | 76.9 | 9.4 | 32 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109
Primary metric
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tennessee
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UNLV
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Clemson
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
439 primary output · 89.4 efficiency · 13.1 usage
61.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Georgia
52.8
276 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 9.4 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Georgia
49
244 primary · 81 efficiency · 8.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8876
CPA · Nashville, TN
- Committed To
- Vanderbilt
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
959
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.