Usage Score
9.9
Player Dossier
2023-2025Texas A&M
LB • 6'2" • 222 lbs • Katy, TX, USA
Daymion Sanford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.9
Efficiency
34
Consistency
40.1
Season Value
29.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Daymion Sanford, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Daymion Sanford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34 disruption score.
Daymion Sanford played LB for Texas A&M. Across 3 tracked seasons, Daymion Sanford recorded 94 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 34 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
34
Usage
9.9
Consistency
40.1
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0.5. UTSA: 0. Notre Dame: 3. Auburn: 2. Mississippi State: 4. Florida: 2. Arkansas: 1. LSU: 1. Missouri: 3. South Carolina: 0. Unknown: 0. Texas: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 7 by 34.2. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. Notre Dame: 7 by 59.2. Auburn: 2 by 28.3. Mississippi State: 9 by 77.5. Florida: 8 by 53.3. Arkansas: 5 by 30.8. LSU: 1 by 14.2. Missouri: 5 by 50.8. South Carolina: 7 by 29.2. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 4 by 21.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
77.5 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ MissouriSplash game | W 38-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi StateSplash game | W 31-9 | 9 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre DameSplash game | W 41-40 | 7 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 8.3 | 1.5 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 8.5 | 18.6 | 3.9 | 8.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 8.5 | 18.6 | 3.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 17 | 34 | 9.9 | 8.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 17 | 34 | 9.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.8 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#3
Notre Dame
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.4 takeover score.
#4
Missouri
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49 takeover score.
#5
Florida
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0 primary output · 8.3 efficiency · 1.5 usage
36.6
#2
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
29.3
17 primary · 34 efficiency · 9.9 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
29.3
17 primary · 34 efficiency · 9.9 usage
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.897
Paetow · Katy, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
94
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.