Usage Score
11.5
Player Dossier
2023-2025Clemson
DE • 6'6" • 260 lbs • Carmel, IN, USA
Will Heldt shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
11.5
Efficiency
37.4
Consistency
60.7
Season Value
52.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Will Heldt, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Clemson. Will Heldt shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.4 disruption score.
Will Heldt played DE for Purdue and Clemson. Across 3 tracked seasons, Will Heldt recorded 114 tackles and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Clemson paired 32.5 primary output with 37.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Clemson.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with 8 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.5
Efficiency
37.4
Usage
11.5
Consistency
60.7
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 2.5. LSU: 2. Troy: 3. Georgia Tech: 2. Syracuse: 1. North Carolina: 0. Boston College: 3. SMU: 3.5. Duke: 2. Florida State: 2. Louisville: 0.5. Furman: 3. South Carolina: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 8 by 58.3. LSU: 3 by 32.5. Troy: 5 by 50.8. Georgia Tech: 4 by 36.7. Syracuse: 4 by 26.7. North Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Boston College: 4 by 46.7. SMU: 2 by 43.3. Duke: 1 by 24.2. Florida State: 3 by 32.5. Louisville: 4 by 21.7. Furman: 2 by 38.3. South Carolina: 4 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Penn StateSplash game | L 10-22 | 8 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ South CarolinaSplash game | W 28-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs FurmanSplash game | W 45-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Louisville | W 20-19 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Florida StateSplash game | W 24-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs DukeSplash game | L 45-46 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs SMUSplash game | L 24-35 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Boston CollegeSplash game | W 41-10 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ North Carolina | W 38-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Syracuse | L 21-34 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Georgia TechSplash game | L 21-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs TroySplash game | W 27-16 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs LSUSplash game | L 10-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2023-2024
Opening stop
Clemson
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Purdue | 2 | 7.8 | 2.1 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Purdue | 20 | 35.3 | 12.7 | 18 |
| 2025 Postseason | Clemson | 32.5 | 37.4 | 11.5 | 12.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Clemson | 32.5 | 37.4 | 11.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 68.1 takeover score.
#2
South Carolina
8
Primary metric
Win with 8 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
8 disruption/tackle impact with 63.4 takeover score.
#3
Ohio State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.4 takeover score.
#4
Syracuse
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.4 takeover score.
#5
Penn State
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 35.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Clemson
32.5 primary output · 37.4 efficiency · 11.5 usage
52.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Clemson
52.4
32.5 primary · 37.4 efficiency · 11.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Purdue
38.3
20 primary · 35.3 efficiency · 12.7 usage
2
Impact games
15
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8753
Carmel · Carmel, IN
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
114
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 34 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.