Usage Score
7.8
Player Dossier
2023-2025Tulane
Justyn Reid
TE • 6'5" • 255 lbs • Newnan, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Justyn Reid reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.4
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane
23242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Southern Miss • Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justyn Reid, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane. Justyn Reid reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Tulane paired 200 primary output with 71.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Southern Miss, Tulane.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Tulane
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
16.7
Efficiency
71.4
Usage
7.8
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 29. Northwestern: 47. South Alabama: 5. Ole Miss: 7. Tulsa: 14. East Carolina: 19. Army: 22. UTSA: 16. Memphis: 13. Florida Atlantic: 15. Temple: 5. Charlotte: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 1 by 100. Northwestern: 3 by 100. South Alabama: 1 by 33.3. Ole Miss: 1 by 46.7. Tulsa: 1 by 93.3. East Carolina: 1 by 100. Army: 2 by 73.3. UTSA: 2 by 53.3. Memphis: 1 by 86.7. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100. Temple: 2 by 16.7. Charlotte: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16.4 · Games = 9 · -0.9 vs Losses
Losses17.3 · Games = 3 · +0.9 vs Wins
First Half20.2 · Games = 6 · +7.0 vs Second Half
Second Half13.2 · Games = 6 · -7.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-41 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 29 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Charlotte | W 27-0 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Temple | W 37-13 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 35-24 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Memphis | W 38-32 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Thu 10/30 | @ UTSA | L 26-48 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Army | W 24-17 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 10/9 | vs East Carolina | W 26-19 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Tulsa | W 31-14 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-45 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ South Alabama | W 33-31 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Northwestern | W 23-3 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Southern Miss
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Tulane
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 13 | 86.7 | 9.1 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 145 | 80 | 7.8 | 132 |
| 2025 Postseason | Tulane | 200 | 71.4 | 7.8 | 55 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulane | 200 | 71.4 | 7.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
62
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida State
13
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Ole Miss
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Tulane
200 primary output · 71.4 efficiency · 7.8 usage
59.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Tulane
59.5
200 primary · 71.4 efficiency · 7.8 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Southern Miss
51.1
145 primary · 80 efficiency · 7.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8336
Newnan · Newnan, GA
- Committed To
- Southern Miss
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
358
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.