Player Dossier

2023-2025

Texas State

Chris Dawn Jr.

WR • 5'7" • 170 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA

Alpha targetExplosive finisher

Chris Dawn Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

27.9

Efficiency

70.2

Consistency

64.6

Season Value

65.7

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas State

2324242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
Texas State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Chris Dawn Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas State. Chris Dawn Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Chris Dawn Jr. played WR for Texas State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Chris Dawn Jr. recorded -2 rushing yards, 1,511 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Texas State paired 1,007 primary output with 70.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 70.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Texas State

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

83.9

Efficiency

70.2

Usage

27.9

Consistency

64.6

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Rice: 76. Eastern Michigan: 50. UTSA: 109. Arizona State: 1. Arkansas State: 46. Troy: 119. Marshall: 180. James Madison: 6. Louisiana: 89. Southern Miss: 117. UL Monroe: 60. South Alabama: 154

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 11 by 46.1. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 66.7. UTSA: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 1 by 6.7. Arkansas State: 5 by 61.3. Troy: 7 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 100. James Madison: 2 by 20. Louisiana: 7 by 84.8. Southern Miss: 5 by 100. UL Monroe: 7 by 57.1. South Alabama: 8 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins94.3 · Games = 6 · +20.8 vs Losses
Losses73.5 · Games = 6 · -20.8 vs Wins
First Half66.8 · Games = 6 · -34.2 vs Second Half
Second Half101 · Games = 6 · +34.2 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

South Alabama

Best efficiency game

100 vs South Alabama

Result
Fri 1/2vs RiceHigh volume · 2+ TDW 41-1011766.96.90215
Sat 11/29vs South Alabama100 receiving yards · High volumeW 49-26815419.319.30048
Sat 11/22vs UL MonroeW 31-147608.68.60016
Sat 11/15@ Southern Miss100 receiving yardsW 41-14511723.423.40182
Sat 11/8@ LouisianaL 39-4278912.712.70140
Wed 10/29vs James MadisonL 20-52263303
Sat 10/18@ Marshall100 receiving yardsL 37-40518029.736066
Sun 10/12vs Troy100 receiving yardsL 41-4871191717035
Sat 10/4@ Arkansas StateL 30-315469.29.20024
Sun 9/14@ Arizona StateL 15-34111101
Sat 9/6@ UTSA100 receiving yardsW 43-36210954.554.50056
Sun 8/31vs Eastern MichiganW 52-275501010021

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Texas State

    2023-2025

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20232024202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2023 Regular SeasonTexas State8669.311.5
2024 PostseasonTexas State41857.413.1332
2024 Regular SeasonTexas State41857.413.10
2025 PostseasonTexas State1,00770.227.9589
2025 Regular SeasonTexas State1,00770.227.90

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

UTSA

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

150

Primary metric

150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

South Alabama

154

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Marshall

180

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Troy

119

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Southern Miss

117

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2025 Postseason · Texas State

1,007 primary output · 70.2 efficiency · 27.9 usage

65.7

#2

2025 Regular Season · Texas State

65.7

1,007 primary · 70.2 efficiency · 27.9 usage

#3

2024 Postseason · Texas State

36.8

418 primary · 57.4 efficiency · 13.1 usage

Milestones

6

100+ receiving yards

2

8+ catch outings

3

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2023 · Rating 0.8492

Horn · Mesquite, TX

Committed To
Texas State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2023

Career Facts

1

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

1,511

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.