Usage Score
27.9
Player Dossier
2023-2025Texas State
WR • 5'7" • 170 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA
Chris Dawn Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
27.9
Efficiency
70.2
Consistency
64.6
Season Value
65.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Dawn Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas State. Chris Dawn Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Chris Dawn Jr. played WR for Texas State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Chris Dawn Jr. recorded -2 rushing yards, 1,511 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas State paired 1,007 primary output with 70.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
83.9
Efficiency
70.2
Usage
27.9
Consistency
64.6
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 76. Eastern Michigan: 50. UTSA: 109. Arizona State: 1. Arkansas State: 46. Troy: 119. Marshall: 180. James Madison: 6. Louisiana: 89. Southern Miss: 117. UL Monroe: 60. South Alabama: 154
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 11 by 46.1. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 66.7. UTSA: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 1 by 6.7. Arkansas State: 5 by 61.3. Troy: 7 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 100. James Madison: 2 by 20. Louisiana: 7 by 84.8. Southern Miss: 5 by 100. UL Monroe: 7 by 57.1. South Alabama: 8 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | vs RiceHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 41-10 | — | 11 | 76 | 6.9 | 6.90 | 2 | 15 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs South Alabama100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-26 | — | 8 | 154 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs UL Monroe | W 31-14 | — | 7 | 60 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Southern Miss100 receiving yards | W 41-14 | — | 5 | 117 | 23.4 | 23.40 | 1 | 82 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Louisiana | L 39-42 | — | 7 | 89 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 40 |
| Wed 10/29 | vs James Madison | L 20-52 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Marshall100 receiving yards | L 37-40 | — | 5 | 180 | 29.7 | 36 | 0 | 66 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Troy100 receiving yards | L 41-48 | — | 7 | 119 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Arkansas State | L 30-31 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Arizona State | L 15-34 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ UTSA100 receiving yards | W 43-36 | — | 2 | 109 | 54.5 | 54.50 | 0 | 56 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 52-27 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 21 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas State
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas State | 86 | 69.3 | 11.5 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas State | 418 | 57.4 | 13.1 | 332 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas State | 418 | 57.4 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas State | 1,007 | 70.2 | 27.9 | 589 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas State | 1,007 | 70.2 | 27.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150
Primary metric
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Alabama
154
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
180
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Troy
119
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas State
1,007 primary output · 70.2 efficiency · 27.9 usage
65.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas State
65.7
1,007 primary · 70.2 efficiency · 27.9 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Texas State
36.8
418 primary · 57.4 efficiency · 13.1 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8492
Horn · Mesquite, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,511
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.