Usage Score
8.6
Player Dossier
2023-2025Alabama
DB • 6'2" • 213 lbs • Ocean Springs, MS, USA
Brayson Hubbard shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.6
Efficiency
33.5
Consistency
40.3
Season Value
45.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brayson Hubbard, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Alabama. Brayson Hubbard shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.5 disruption score.
Brayson Hubbard played DB for Alabama. Across 3 tracked seasons, Brayson Hubbard recorded 132 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Alabama.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Alabama paired 19.5 primary output with 33.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Illinois
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 93.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
33.5
Usage
8.6
Consistency
40.3
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 2.5. Oklahoma: 0. Florida State: 1. UL Monroe: 1. Wisconsin: 4. Georgia: 1.5. Vanderbilt: 0. Missouri: 2. Tennessee: 0. South Carolina: 2. LSU: 1. Oklahoma: 0. Eastern Illinois: 3.5. Auburn: 1. Georgia: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 8 by 58.3. Oklahoma: 5 by 20.8. Florida State: 5 by 30.8. UL Monroe: 3 by 22.5. Wisconsin: 0 by 40. Georgia: 9 by 52.5. Vanderbilt: 3 by 12.5. Missouri: 4 by 36.7. Tennessee: 7 by 29.2. South Carolina: 8 by 53.3. LSU: 5 by 30.8. Oklahoma: 5 by 20.8. Eastern Illinois: 4 by 51.7. Auburn: 2 by 18.3. Georgia: 6 by 25
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Illinois
Best efficiency game
58.3 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ IndianaSplash game | L 3-38 | 8 | 7 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/20 | @ Oklahoma | W 34-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | vs Georgia | L 7-28 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/30 | @ Auburn | W 27-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Eastern IllinoisSplash game | W 56-0 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Oklahoma | L 21-23 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | vs LSU | W 20-9 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ South CarolinaSplash game | W 29-22 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Tennessee | W 37-20 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ MissouriSplash game | W 27-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Vanderbilt | W 30-14 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Georgia | W 24-21 | 9 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs WisconsinSplash game | W 38-14 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs UL Monroe | W 73-0 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Florida State | L 17-31 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Alabama | 6 | 29.8 | 5.9 | 6 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Alabama | 6 | 29.8 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Alabama | 19.5 | 33.5 | 8.6 | 13.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Alabama | 19.5 | 33.5 | 8.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Illinois
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#2
Wisconsin
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#3
LSU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#4
Indiana
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 47.5 takeover score.
#5
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 36.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Alabama
19.5 primary output · 33.5 efficiency · 8.6 usage
45.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Alabama
45.6
19.5 primary · 33.5 efficiency · 8.6 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Alabama
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
0
Impact games
6
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9024
Ocean Springs · Ocean Springs, MS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
132
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.