Usage Score
22.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025Wisconsin
Trech Kekahuna
WR • 5'10" • 185 lbs • Honolulu, HI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Trech Kekahuna reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
49.8
Consistency
40.4
Season Value
43
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Wisconsin
232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trech Kekahuna, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Wisconsin. Trech Kekahuna reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Trech Kekahuna played WR for Wisconsin. Across 3 tracked seasons, Trech Kekahuna recorded 140 rushing yards, 614 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Wisconsin.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 339 primary output with 71.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 49.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Wisconsin
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
17.6
Efficiency
49.8
Usage
22.2
Consistency
40.4
Best Game by takeover score
Minnesota
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 18. Middle Tennessee: 28. Alabama: 0. Maryland: 77. Michigan: 20. Iowa: 0. Ohio State: -5. Oregon: 23. Washington: 4. Indiana: 0. Illinois: 39. Minnesota: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 2 by 60. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 46.7. Maryland: 5 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 100. Ohio State: 1 by 0. Oregon: 3 by 51.1. Washington: 1 by 26.7. Illinois: 5 by 52. Minnesota: 4 by 11.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins22.3 · Games = 4 · +7 vs Losses
Losses15.3 · Games = 8 · -7 vs Wins
First Half23.8 · Games = 6 · +12.5 vs Second Half
Second Half11.3 · Games = 6 · -12.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Maryland
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Minnesota | L 7-17 | — | 4 | 7 | 1 | 1.80 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/23 | vs Illinois | W 27-10 | — | 5 | 39 | 10 | 7.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Indiana | L 7-31 | — | — | — | 4.3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Washington | W 13-10 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Oregon | L 7-21 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Ohio State | L 0-34 | — | 1 | -5 | -5 | -5 | 0 | -5 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Iowa | L 0-37 | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Michigan | L 10-24 | — | 1 | 20 | 12.5 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Maryland | L 10-27 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Alabama | L 14-38 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 42-10 | — | 4 | 28 | 17.8 | 7 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Miami (OH) | W 17-0 | — | 2 | 18 | 6.3 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Wisconsin | 64 | 100 | 14.8 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 339 | 71.5 | 17.4 | 275 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 211 | 49.8 | 22.2 | -128 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134
Primary metric
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Maryland
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
LSU
64
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
64
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 52 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Wisconsin
339 primary output · 71.5 efficiency · 17.4 usage
59.2
#2
2023 Postseason · Wisconsin
58.2
64 primary · 100 efficiency · 14.8 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Wisconsin
43
211 primary · 49.8 efficiency · 22.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8875
Bishop Gorman · Las Vegas, NV
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
614
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.