Usage Score
26.5
Player Profile
Amare Thomas
WR • 6'0" • 205 lbs • Birmingham, AL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Amare Thomas reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.9
Consistency
71.5
Season Value
70.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Houston
23242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Primary stop by seasons
- UAB
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Houston
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Amare Thomas, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Houston. Amare Thomas reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Houston paired 966 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, Houston.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Houston
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
74.3
Efficiency
83.9
Usage
26.5
Consistency
71.5
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 60. Unknown: 44. Rice: 16. Colorado: 50. Oregon State: 104. Texas Tech: 70. Oklahoma State: 157. Arizona: 69. Arizona State: 25. West Virginia: 99. UCF: 103. TCU: 72. Baylor: 97
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 8 by 50. Unknown: 3 by 97.8. Rice: 2 by 53.3. Colorado: 3 by 100. Oregon State: 6 by 100. Texas Tech: 2 by 100. Oklahoma State: 7 by 100. Arizona: 4 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 55.6. West Virginia: 10 by 66. UCF: 5 by 100. TCU: 5 by 96. Baylor: 9 by 71.9
Split Comparison
Wins75.7 · n=9 · -4.7 vs Losses
Losses80.3 · n=3 · +4.7 vs Wins
First Half71.6 · n=7 · -5.9 vs Second Half
Second Half77.5 · n=6 · +5.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/28 | vs LSUHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 38-35 | — | 8 | 60 | 6.4 | 7.50 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ BaylorHigh volume | W 31-24 | — | 9 | 97 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs TCU | L 14-17 | — | 5 | 72 | 12.3 | 14.40 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ UCF100 receiving yards | W 30-27 | — | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 1 | 64 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs West VirginiaHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 35-45 | — | 10 | 99 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 3 | 27 |
| Sun 10/26 | @ Arizona State | W 24-16 | — | 3 | 25 | 6.2 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Arizona2+ TD | W 31-28 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 2 | 52 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Oklahoma State100 receiving yards | W 39-17 | — | 7 | 157 | 22.4 | 22.40 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Texas Tech | L 11-35 | — | 2 | 70 | 35 | 35 | 1 | 64 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Oregon State100 receiving yards | W 27-24 | — | 6 | 104 | 15.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Fri 9/12 | vs Colorado | W 36-20 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Rice | W 35-9 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Houston
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | UAB | 437 | 54.8 | 19.8 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | UAB | 670 | 68.4 | 22.5 | 233 |
| 2025 Postseason | Houston | 966 | 83.9 | 26.5 | 296 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Houston | 966 | 83.9 | 26.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
157
Primary metric
157 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulane
98
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UConn
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 82.5 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 80.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Houston
966 primary output · 83.9 efficiency · 26.5 usage
70.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Houston
70.5
966 primary · 83.9 efficiency · 26.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · UAB
59.5
670 primary · 68.4 efficiency · 22.5 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8606
Pinson Valley · Pinson, AL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,073
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.