Usage Score
24.3
Player Dossier
2023-2025UTSA
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Jacksonville, TX, USA
Devin McCuin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.3
Efficiency
69.6
Consistency
76.3
Season Value
67.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin McCuin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA. Devin McCuin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
UTSA paired 726 primary output with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
60.5
Efficiency
69.6
Usage
24.3
Consistency
76.3
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 73. Texas A&M: 33. Texas State: 83. Unknown: 51. Colorado State: 50. Temple: 60. Rice: 64. North Texas: 23. Tulane: 96. South Florida: 7. Charlotte: 100. Army: 86
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 6 by 81.1. Texas A&M: 6 by 36.7. Texas State: 5 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 48.6. Colorado State: 4 by 83.3. Temple: 6 by 66.7. Rice: 3 by 100. North Texas: 4 by 38.3. Tulane: 8 by 80. South Florida: 2 by 23.3. Charlotte: 7 by 95.2. Army: 7 by 81.9
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Florida International | W 57-20 | — | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army | L 24-27 | — | 7 | 86 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte100 receiving yards | W 28-7 | — | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 45 |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 10/30 | vs TulaneHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 48-26 | — | 8 | 96 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 35 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas | L 17-55 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice | W 61-13 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Temple | L 21-27 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 9/21 | @ Colorado State | W 17-16 | — | 4 | 50 | 9.8 | 12.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 7 | 51 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 2 | 24 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas State | L 36-43 | — | 5 | 83 | 15.8 | 16.60 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-42 | — | 6 | 33 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 546 | 75.3 | 16.2 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 546 | 75.3 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 424 | 59.6 | 23.2 | -122 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 424 | 59.6 | 23.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | UTSA | 726 | 69.6 | 24.3 | 302 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 726 | 69.6 | 24.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Primary metric
100 receiving yards with a 95.2 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Florida
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Texas State
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · UTSA
726 primary output · 69.6 efficiency · 24.3 usage
67.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
67.6
726 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · UTSA
57.3
546 primary · 75.3 efficiency · 16.2 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8667
Jacksonville · Jacksonville, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,696
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Devin McCuin quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit