Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025Rutgers
Abram Wright
LB • 6'1" • 221 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Abram Wright shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
23.3
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
35.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Rutgers
23232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Abram Wright, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Rutgers. Abram Wright shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.3 disruption score.
Abram Wright played LB for Rutgers. Across 3 tracked seasons, Abram Wright recorded 68 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Rutgers.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 3.5 primary output with 23.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 23.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
23.3
Usage
5.2
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 0. Norfolk State: 0. Iowa: 0. Minnesota: 1. Washington: 1. Oregon: 0. Purdue: 0. Illinois: 1. Maryland: 0. Ohio State: 0.5. Penn State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 1 by 4.2. Norfolk State: 2 by 8.3. Iowa: 7 by 29.2. Minnesota: 4 by 26.7. Washington: 5 by 30.8. Oregon: 6 by 25. Purdue: 8 by 33.3. Illinois: 6 by 35. Maryland: 6 by 25. Ohio State: 7 by 34.2. Penn State: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 4 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 7 · +0.5 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
35 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Penn State | L 36-40 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Ohio State | L 9-42 | 7 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Maryland | W 35-20 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Illinois | L 13-35 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Purdue | W 27-24 | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Oregon | L 10-56 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Washington | L 19-38 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Minnesota | L 28-31 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Iowa | L 28-38 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Norfolk State | W 60-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Miami (OH) | W 45-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Rutgers | 1 | 12.1 | 6.1 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1 | 12.1 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Rutgers | 3 | 11.1 | 2.4 | 2 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Rutgers | 3.5 | 23.3 | 5.2 | 0.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.9 takeover score.
#2
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
#3
Washington
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.3 takeover score.
#4
Minnesota
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#5
Miami
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Rutgers
3.5 primary output · 23.3 efficiency · 5.2 usage
35.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Rutgers
26.9
3 primary · 11.1 efficiency · 2.4 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Rutgers
24.2
1 primary · 12.1 efficiency · 6.1 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8575
Fleming Island · Orange Park, FL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
68
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 21 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Abram Wright
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.